[ut3] LINUX CLIENT RELEASE DATE - OFFICIAL

Nagromme nagromme at gmail.com
Sat Dec 15 13:51:41 EST 2007


I assume that software-driven PhysX would simply process things more  
slowly than hardware-boosted PhysX. The game might respond by not  
rendering some optional effects, but for things that affect game play,  
if a map really needed PhysX hardware then I expect those without it  
would simply see poor frame rates. How poor would depend on their CPU  
power.

nagromme




Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Rick Page" <mpcacrucesalus at gmail.com>
> Date: December 15, 2007 1:33:17 PM EST
> To: ut3 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [ut3] LINUX CLIENT RELEASE DATE - OFFICIAL
> Reply-To: ut3 at icculus.org
>
> This brings up an interesting question. I have not kept up with  
> reading all about the PhysX card. So some facts would be great,  
> before it gets mixed in with speculations. Now my question. What  
> happens on the client side for all of us that don't have the PhysX  
> card? If someone online that has a card blows up a building and it  
> comes tumbling down on top of you, and you don't have the card, do  
> you still see a building wall coming down on you? I am sure that it  
> just won't be as spectacular on your end as their end.
> Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/ut3/attachments/20071215/a866996a/attachment.htm>


More information about the ut3 mailing list