[ut2004] Help? 64 bit linux client and poor fps.

[Clint Goudie-Nice]

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-11-11_10.48]
x86-64 Linux
 Unknown processor @ 2000 MHz
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=1?numbots=12?quickstart=1?attractcam=1 -
benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

9.921779 / 45.683815 / 141.720291 fps         rand[928185910]
Score = 45.463982

I scored significantly lower than you... I'll run the same thing tonight
in windows and send the result.. I'll also go back to the 3323 patch and
give that a go.

:S

> You should be getting quite a bit more fps than that with your setup. 
> I'm using an Athlon 2500 with a 128 Meg GF4 Ti 4600 and here's my 
> benchmark scores:
> 
> UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-09-07_17.17]
> x86 Linux
> AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1904 MHz
> GeForce4 Ti 4800/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
>  
> dm-rankin?spectatoronly=1?numbots=12?quickstart=1?attractcam=1 
> -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini 
> -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
>  
> 24.417984 / 70.467400 / 159.092743 fps         rand[1211459421]
> Score = 66.260307
> 
> 
> Try benchmarking and see what you come up with. It's hard to judge what 
> performance your really getting just by saying that it runs slow on 
> certain maps in certain conditions. Then as you keep making changes to 
> your system you can benchmark again to see what difference that 
> particular change makes. I posted one time to this list complaining 
> about Valarna running slow on my system, and Ryan commented that it 
> might be a poorly optimized map. So some maps will run slower than 
> others. The above bench results are with the 3323 patch, the 3339 patch 
> benchmarks at:
> 
> 7.345902 / 60.180714 / 197.631500 fps         rand[496427488]
> Score = 58.062550
> 
> Needless to say I'll give up some of the eye candy and switch back to 
> the 3323 patch.
> 
>                 Rick B