admin at ztnet.com
Sat Jul 31 12:07:21 EDT 2004
Heh, I beg to differ. The loki updater was cool 'when it worked'. When it
didn't, getting a tarball out of that was not an enjoyable experience.
Considering the updates are primiarly some additional files and a few
updated ones, that come out in all-inclusive (previous patches included)
tarballs, I'm pretty satisfied with that. Direct access to files is a big
plus, for when you would prefer just to tar xfz utupdate.tar.gz over your
install, or even peruse the patch files BEFORE installaion. :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bjorn Andersen" <ba at linuxin.dk>
To: <ut2004 at icculus.org>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: [ut2004] lokiupdater?
> In UT2003 we had the best updating tool ever, the loki updater.
> Where has that gone in UT2004?
> Best Regards
> Bjorn Andersen
> <ba at linuxin.dk>
More information about the ut2004