[ut2003io] 10 avg FPS. What the ... ?

[Jon Trulson]

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, tk Voice wrote:

> From: tk Voice <tkVoice at netscape.net>
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:24:55 -0600
> Subject: Re: [ut2003io] 10 avg FPS.  What the ... ?
> To: ut2003 at icculus.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
> 	version=2.60
>
> Slackware 9.1 here with XP1600 and GeForce2-32MB and it runs at about
> avg 15fps at 800x600 and almost 20fps at 640x480.
>
> I thought it was running smoother than that but "stat fps" typed in the
> console doesn't lie.
>

	I was wondering about the fps display... I'm using XiG Summit on a
Mobility Radeon 9000, Pentium M/1.8Ghz, and I'm getting anywhere from
about 20 (outdoors) to 80 indoors.  Using the 800x600 res.  What's curious
is that even though in the outdoor assault mode the fps seems low, it
still seems playable.  Not at all like ut2003 Antulus (sp?) when the fps
would drop to 10 or so in some areas.

	Strange.  Overall though, performance seems better than with
ut2003.


-- 
Jon Trulson    mailto:jon at radscan.com
ID: 1A9A2B09, FP: C23F328A721264E7 B6188192EC733962
PGP keys at http://radscan.com/~jon/PGPKeys.txt
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
"I am Nomad." -Nomad