[ut2003io] Linux Performance

[Dan Trevino]

I assumed the benchmarks were all set to run at a standard resolution
and color depth.  My personal game settings are 800x600, 16 bit color. 
Do the benchmarks read user settings?

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:44, tk Voice wrote:
> At what resolution ?
> 
> Those numbers would realy suck if you were at 320x240.
> But those numbers would be really good if you were running at 1280x960
> 
> dantrevino at wrevolution.org wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 08:37, Dana Olson wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>HAH! Let us know what happens if you try NvAGP again after this. :)
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >OK, here ( http://wrevolution.org/nvidia_performance.jsp ) is a little
> >table with the results.  
> >
> >Summary: NvAGP, on average, gives a few extra fps, but not enough to be
> >statistically significant.  Enabling fast writes and side band
> >addressing also yield little performance boost (less than 2%).
> >
> >dan
> >  
> >
-- 
Life is short. Play naked.
wrevolution.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/ut2003/attachments/20030530/2872829c/attachment.pgp>