[ut2003io] Linux Performance
dantrevino at wrevolution.org
Fri May 30 16:39:09 EDT 2003
I assumed the benchmarks were all set to run at a standard resolution
and color depth. My personal game settings are 800x600, 16 bit color.
Do the benchmarks read user settings?
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:44, tk Voice wrote:
> At what resolution ?
> Those numbers would realy suck if you were at 320x240.
> But those numbers would be really good if you were running at 1280x960
> dantrevino at wrevolution.org wrote:
> >On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 08:37, Dana Olson wrote:
> >>HAH! Let us know what happens if you try NvAGP again after this. :)
> >OK, here ( http://wrevolution.org/nvidia_performance.jsp ) is a little
> >table with the results.
> >Summary: NvAGP, on average, gives a few extra fps, but not enough to be
> >statistically significant. Enabling fast writes and side band
> >addressing also yield little performance boost (less than 2%).
Life is short. Play naked.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the ut2003