[ut2003io] Linux Performance
tkVoice at netscape.net
Fri May 30 15:44:01 EDT 2003
At what resolution ?
Those numbers would realy suck if you were at 320x240.
But those numbers would be really good if you were running at 1280x960
dantrevino at wrevolution.org wrote:
>On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 08:37, Dana Olson wrote:
>>HAH! Let us know what happens if you try NvAGP again after this. :)
>OK, here ( http://wrevolution.org/nvidia_performance.jsp ) is a little
>table with the results.
>Summary: NvAGP, on average, gives a few extra fps, but not enough to be
>statistically significant. Enabling fast writes and side band
>addressing also yield little performance boost (less than 2%).
More information about the ut2003