[quake2] ati-driver and q2 performance
wakko at generation.no
Tue Mar 29 07:56:57 EST 2005
I just rechecked and confirmed on another computer with an ati-card, that
performance is way better (stable 200fps) in quake2-qmax than in regular
quake2 (50-70fps). Could anyone speculate in what this could be? sure the
drivers are bad, quake2 and qmax is basically the same thing right? and I
of course used the same drivers on both.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:44:35 +0100, Anders Storsveen <wakko at generation.no>
> no low performance in regular quake2 with nvidia on my desktop computer.
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:50:06 +0100, Anders Storsveen
> <wakko at generation.no> wrote:
>> I have cl_maxfps at 200, vsync shouldn't be enabled. and if I turn down
>> the res to like 320x240 I get closer to 100fps. so its not that.
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:40:55 +0100, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net>
>>> On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 04:07 +0100, Anders Storsveen wrote:
>>>> whats the difference between qmax and regular? that would give such a
>>>> dramatic increase, from 60 to 200....
>>> Maybe some kind of framerate limiting is enabled in one case, like
>>> sync-to-vblank or cl_maxfps (sp?)?
The Next Generation
More information about the quake2