[quake2] Starting out questions
brendanburns at comcast.net
Tue Sep 21 08:37:46 EDT 2004
before you get too far refining the makefiles, please coordinate with
Thomas Fogal <tfogal at pascal.unh.edu> who has also indicated that he is
working on redoing the build system.
On Sep 20, 2004, at 10:23 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 08:05:17PM -0400, Brendan Burns wrote:
>> On Sep 18, 2004, at 7:36 PM, Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
>>> I'm about to start tinkering with the Q2 sources, having chosen
>>> icculus-quake2 over quake2forge for several reasons. I was wondering
>>> if you could confirm some things for me:
>>> - The build system is better to me (I hate all that autoconf/automake
>>> stuff.) Any plans to revamp it? (I hope no move to autoconf /
>> Well, I think that's the first time anyone has called the build system
>> "better" but no, there are no current plans to move to autoconf. We
>> should probably split the Makefile into a bunch of smaller makefiles
>> and start using suffix rules. (anyone? anyone?) but I'm not going to
>> it anytime soon.
> I'll probably sit and overhaul build infrastructure during the next few
> days whan I have spare cycles.
> I also want to thank Brendan for not going after autotools. ;-)
> real hassle to support and to fix, from my experience. Also, files
> generate (e.g., ./configure) are hardly readable.
More information about the quake2