[physfs] linking problem

Bjørn Lindeijer b.lindeijer at gmail.com
Fri Feb 25 02:48:48 EST 2005


Uhm, I just want to clarify that I totally missed the context of this
email, and that "we only support" was referring to a project of me
that is using PhysFS, not PhysFS itself, heh.

Regards,
Bjørn

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:48:32 +0100, Bjørn Lindeijer
<b.lindeijer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> You must understand that we only actually support gcc and MinGW, but
> we do have a single developer on our team that is using MSVC (7.1 I
> think), and he certainly got PhysFS to work. You may want to try
> contacting him. It's zenogais: zenogais at gmail.com.
> 
> Regards,
> Bjørn
> 
> 
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:24:20 -0500, Daniel Dadush <dndadush at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, I'm terribly new at this so I'm sorry if my question is rather dumb.
> > I was desperately trying to built the physfs.dll from both within
> > cygwin and ms visual studio 8 (beta) and I kept getting linker errors.
> > This is the error I get from visual studio 8:
> >
> > ------ Build started: Project: physfs, Configuration: Release
> > Multithreaded DLL Win32 ------
> > Compiling...
> > zutil.c
> > zip.c
> > win32.c
> > wad.c
> > uncompr.c
> > trees.c
> > qpak.c
> > physfs_byteorder.c
> > physfs.c
> > mvl.c
> > inftrees.c
> > inflate.c
> > inffast.c
> > hog.c
> > grp.c
> > dir.c
> > deflate.c
> > crc32.c
> > compress.c
> > adler32.c
> > Linking...
> >    Creating library .\Release/physfs.lib and object .\Release/physfs.exp
> > win32.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__OpenProcessToken at 12
> > win32.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__GetUserNameA at 8
> > .\Release/physfs.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 2 unresolved externals
> > Build log was saved at
> > "file://c:\cygwin\home\Daniel_N_Dadush\physfs\Release\BuildLog.htm"
> > physfs - 3 error(s), 0 warning(s)
> >
> > I would really like to get this built but I really have no idea what's
> > going wrong. If anyone has any idea what I'm doing wrong I would
> > really appreciate it.
> >
>



More information about the physfs mailing list