<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Globe Trotter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:itsme_410@yahoo.com">itsme_410@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Sorry if this is considered to be a little OT, but is there a more recent study which has analysed Which WM is best in terms of low use of resources? OB/PekWM/BB/FB/FVWM/IceWM, etc?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I expect TWM would be much lower than all the above.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Dana</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Thanks!<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
openbox mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:openbox@icculus.org">openbox@icculus.org</a><br>
<a href="http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>