[mohaa] ...so...?

[monthos at mx3.org]

i generally have mine around 20000 although im not entirly sure if moh
goes past the 10000 barrier, i know hlds didnt, but im pretty sure moh
does. anyone wanna enlighten my ignorant self on this?

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Matrix wrote:

> What would you suggest for the sv_maxrate?
>
> I have tried 3000, 4000, 4500, 6000, 10000
>
> When I went to the 4500 to the 6000 range, the server did smooth out
> more, but it was still the same activity when it gets above 20 clients.
> :(
>
>
> Thanks,
> Matrix
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: monthos at mx3.org [mailto:monthos at mx3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 9:03 PM
> To: mohaa at icculus.org
> Subject: RE: [mohaa] ...so...?
>
> it could be that the sv_maxrate is set too low, not enouph data allowed
> to
> be sent to clients, this is especially the case on large open maps like
> omaha.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Matrix wrote:
>
> > Runs very smooth below 20 clients, but that seems to be the case for
> > MOHAA and SpearHead.  Get above 20 clients, that pings sky rocket with
> 1
> > of 4 2.4GHz cpu up at maybe 50% to 60% usage.  Hitting about 0.10 on
> the
> > system load as well.  Bandwidth is at 0.01% of available bandwidth on
> my
> > fiber connection.
> >
> > This boggles me!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matrix
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan C. Gordon [mailto:icculus at clutteredmind.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:33 PM
> > To: mohaa at icculus.org
> > Subject: [mohaa] ...so...?
> >
> >
> > I assume from the silence that Spearhead beta5 is running fairly
> stable
> > for everyone? Can anyone report on CPU usage in this version?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --ryan.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>