[Gtkradiant] Re: Patch work for FreeBSD native build
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:05:57 -0400
> On another note, should we be consistent across projects with our *nix define? I was using Q_UNIX in Q3Map2, but can
> change to __nix__ if that's what we're going with.
Absolutely - we don't want another bool/Bool/BOOL debacle. Consistency is
king. TTimo suggested __nix__, but I don't think anyone's committed to that
name. It's trivial to change it because I haven't yet submitted the patch.
Q_UNIX has a little more meaning, I have to admit I kinda like that better
than __nix__. Other than that, I have no preference. ydnar - if you
already have committed code using Q_UNIX, maybe I should follow your lead.
About breaking my promise to get a patch in today: just found out that my
billiards semifinals were moved up a week, so I have to play tonight...
looks like the patch will take another day.