[Gtkradiant] RE: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:17:20 -0600
Yep, there is a new format of brushes. Not a huge difference, but a
required change. We also support light styles, which again, needed a new
From: ydnar [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:50 PM
To: email@example.com; Monroe, James
Subject: Re: [Gtkradiant] RE: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?
Do the compiling tools differ significantly from their Quake 3 ancestors?
IIRC, the only significant difference for compiling EF maps was a few
----- Original Message -----
From: "Monroe, James" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "'Timothee Besset'" <email@example.com>; "Monroe, James"
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:21 AM
Subject: [Gtkradiant] RE: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?
> I plan to release our version of radiant with all the ents and tools
> ... very soon. I just have to take care of getting a demo out first. I
> want to do everything possible to make it easy for people to edit maps.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothee Besset [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:01 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?
> Hey there
> Good job on JKII .. got my copy yesterday and I'm enjoying it. We are
> getting a bunch of requests for JKII support in GtkRadiant already. We are
> probably going to throw in a few resources to add the appropriate
> functionality to GtkRadiant and provide a package if possible. Can you let
> us know what the current plan is, or forward to who takes care of that?
> PS: I have put our public mailing list on CC here to update them on the
> status of JKII support investigations .. you might want to reply only to
> me if there are some NDA matters :-)
> Gtkradiant mailing list