plus if he receives any sort of source code and as he releases stuff as the "cod 5 offical server files" it makes sense for an internal quality control process to take place.<br><br>The wine implementation in my opinion only makes sense for testing. I wouldn't run something through wine on my server.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:27 PM, James Landi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jim@landi.net">jim@landi.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Wolfie - Cybernetic wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">
<br>
Sorry, this may sound like a daft question, but it's something that's always puzzled me.<br>
<br>
Why do the linux binaries need to go through any QA or have permission from the development company?<br>
<br>
I mean what is the difference between someone like Ryan making binaries and releasing them to what people are doing with wine?<br>
<br></div>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</blockquote>
Note that Ryan is hired by Activision and many other game companies to port their files to Linux He does not do this for free or as a hobby.<br>
<br>
-Jim Landi<br>
Rudedog<br>
FPSadmin.com*<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
*<br>
<br>
---<br>
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <a href="mailto:cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org" target="_blank">cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org</a><br>
Mailing list archives: <a href="http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>