Has anyone thought about looking at this from a business perspective? What would happen if Treyarch actually did better than IW?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Caleb Stephens <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:csteph9@gmail.com">csteph9@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Wow! Botched! I was listening to I think last weeks Bashandslash round table, and one of the fellas said that he thought WaW would be dead if they just didn't get in the server redirect in by Christmas. I'd tend to agree with that.<br>
<br>The linux port is just as valuable IMO. In that same roundtable, someone made the comment that the number of servers online was far lower than COD4s at the same time in the release schedule. But nobody mentioned the Linux port not being out for WaW lol. Had the linux bins been out, we probably would have had at least 5 servers up. that's just one clan ... extrapolate that out ...<br>
<br>What can we do as a community to influence IW to develop their servers on Linux as they test and develop COD6, and then have native Linux support right out of the gate? (and then they can perhaps work on the Windows port to be released a month or two after game launch?)<br>
<br>Am I the only one that thinks this is a no-brainier?<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:51 AM, James Landi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jim@landi.net" target="_blank">jim@landi.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">We (Jock, PSTjoker, Garetjax and myself) had Josh (the community manager for Treyarch) last night (Bashandslash.com round table). When asked about a patch he said, not sure but I would guess after the holidays as everyone is on vacation now or soon.<br>
<br>
We also brought up the linux bits and was told they are between Ryan and Activision QA (ryan fixing things as Act finds bugs). if you put 1 and 1 together you can see that it may take the 1.2 patch for the linux bits to be released. Thus after the new years.<br>
<br>
Again take this with a grain of salt, as it's not a so called official word but a speculative response from someone at Treyarch NOT WORKING on the game (code wise) so to speak.<br>
<br>
-Jim Landi<br>
Rudedog<br>
FPSadmin.com<br>
<br>
John Kennington wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>
You see, that is the question. If he patched to 1.2, then it will be delayed until after Jan 1. If he didn't then ATVI is on vacation and the patch will not be released until they get back.<br>
<br></div><div>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31 AM, <a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a>> <<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
they can delay the 1.2 path to the 2015 ... I do not care...<br>
<br>
I'm just waiting a linux dedicated binary :|<br>
<br>
Did ryan ported directly the 1.2 so we will have to wait till the<br>
1.2 will be officially released? :|<br>
<br>
John Kennington ha scritto:<br>
<br>
There is a rumor floating around, I saw it at pbbans, that<br>
patch 1.2 has been delayed until after Jan 1, 09. It seems<br>
that everyone is taking vacation. I wonder if they know what<br>
they have done.<br>
<br>
John<br>
<br>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, <a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a>><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a><div><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a>>> <<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a>><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a><div><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:evolutioncrazy@gmail.com" target="_blank">evolutioncrazy@gmail.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
What's the problem with the QA team?<br>
<br>
wasn't the quality good enough? :(<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- "Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for<br>
anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove<br>
them down the stairs."<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <a href="mailto:cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org" target="_blank">cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org" target="_blank">cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org</a>><div><br>
Mailing list archives: <a href="http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
"Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs."<br>
</div></blockquote><div><div></div><div>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <a href="mailto:cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org" target="_blank">cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org</a><br>
Mailing list archives: <a href="http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs."<br>