<div dir="ltr">Some, but not all. Unless PB fixes the issue where UAV can be seen in the screenshot, they are almost useless.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Robert Mount <<a href="mailto:rmount@pobox.com">rmount@pobox.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Some hack display characters glowing red/green and can be seen through<br>
a wall. No UAV needed for that.<br>
<br>
--Rob<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, John Kennington <<a href="mailto:jwkennington@gmail.com">jwkennington@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Unless you know that UAV is up, you cannot make a determination of cheating<br>
> on ESP or other hacks that block PB screenshots.<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Kjell Munkestam <<a href="mailto:kjell.munkestam@telia.com">kjell.munkestam@telia.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I don't understand what you mean. Surely figures ghosting through a wall<br>
>> have nothing to do with UAV.<br>
>><br>
>> /Kjell<br>
>><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: John Kennington [mailto:<a href="mailto:jwkennington@gmail.com">jwkennington@gmail.com</a>]<br>
>> Sent: den 16 juli 2008 13:15<br>
>> To: <a href="mailto:cod@icculus.org">cod@icculus.org</a><br>
>> Subject: Re: [cod] High lag in 1.7<br>
>><br>
>> It won't matter what they do. Until they can show if UAV is up, the<br>
>> screen shot is pretty useless.<br>
>><br>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:24 PM, MaydaX <<a href="mailto:maydaxone@gmail.com">maydaxone@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> They doubled it to approx 307,200 (640x480)<br>
>>><br>
>>> MaydaX<br>
>>><br>
>>> Kjell Munkestam wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Ok, haven't seen any announcement of that.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Sounds like a good explanation. Admins have probably set up for larger<br>
>>>> than<br>
>>>> 82k pixels but only received 82k pixels and now that it has changed they<br>
>>>> actually get what they set up. Which can be a lot larger than 82k pixels<br>
>>>> (e.g 1024*768 = 786K pixels, about 9-10 times more).<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Anyone know what the max amount of pixels are now?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> /Kjell<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ---<br>
>>> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <a href="mailto:cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org">cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org</a><br>
>>> Mailing list archives: <a href="http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> "Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but you<br>
>> still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs."<br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> "Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but you<br>
> still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs."<br>
<br>
---<br>
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <a href="mailto:cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org">cod-unsubscribe@icculus.org</a><br>
Mailing list archives: <a href="http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs."
</div>