<html>
<body>
<font size=3><br><br>
Yes, I agree. Indeed all along it has been clear the direction ACTV<br>
was taking with COD2. After playing COD for a few years,
indeed<br>
players skills have increased. Let there be a UO2, but leave
the<br>
more infantry based COD2 alone. It Just needs PB.<br><br>
There is nothing like being a good skilled rifleman, and getting wiped by
a<br>
n00b on a T-34. Or worse, the ole' jeep crush against the wall!
;-))<br><br>
There is history in the battles here, and ACTV took WWII to the next
step<br>
and did a great job.<br><br>
Mark<br><br>
PS. Did I mention that it needs an Anti-Cheat System?
Indeed,<br>
Yes, we will all be having a good old noyade directly after
we<br>
have completed the task of defenestrating this game if no PB!!!<br>
I can not be more plain that this ACTV! Are you Listening?<br>
Please inform the morologist that decided against PB to<br>
reconsider.<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
At 05:51 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>I was hoping it would NOT be like
UO as I much preferred vanilla COD and tbh<br>
I am not disappointed, runs great on a Linux box btw ;)<br><br>
Colin</font></blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<tt>S1,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D
EE
defilm@acm.org<br>
defilm@ieee.org<br><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>