<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Yeah I've got RHEL 4 also. BTW, I was the one
that posted about the teamspeak / mysql issue. You need the compat package
for mysql - has the old libraries and such so that you can use them instead of
the new ones that come with the new version of mysql on RHEL4:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Snipet from the teamspeak server.ini:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>VendorLib=/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.10.0.0</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The package you need:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>MySQL-shared-compat-4.0.23-0.i386.rpm<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It may be a different set of numbers now but that's
the name: MySQL-shared-compat</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>After that teamspeak will work with
mysql.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I too ran into problems when I turned on
journaling. The main reason is because on a heavy loaded system because of
the journal update time being 5 seconds it can cause' some lag - there is a
setting you can pass that lowers this - used to work great with the 2.4 kernel
but really the 2.6 doesn't need the journal setting from what I've tested -
hurts it more than helps as Jay mentioned.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>But you can do one performance trick that seems to
have helped some. You can set this in your fstab:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Example:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>ext3
defaults,noatime 1 2<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Add noatime after defaults on the hard drive your
running your game servers off of. Basic explination:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"The noatime setting eliminates the need by the
system to make writes to the file system for files which are simply being
read....."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><BR><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Use at your own risk :) I just thought I'd mention
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I recently got upgraded to a dual 73gig SCSI
server. ThePlanet stuck me in the new datacenter at infomart in
Dallas. Has anyone been put in that datacenter yet? I've been
receiving complaints of ping spikes from one of my customers that is
from California. I gathered trace routes from everyone and it seems to be
the link between datacenter 3 and 5 (the new one - infomart).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anyone else ran into anything yet? From what
I can tell it seems to be only from the western side of the US because of the
trace routes I've received - the ones that had the problem were in like Arizona
and California etc:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>13 246 ms 200
ms 199 ms dist-vlan32.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com
[70.85.127.62]<BR>14 75 ms 57
ms 57 ms po32.dsr1-2.dllstx5.theplanet.com
[70.85.127.110]<BR>15 58 ms 61
ms 58 ms po2.tp-car3.dllstx5.theplanet.com
[70.84.160.165]<BR>16 57 ms 56
ms 56 ms 39.70-84-187.reverse.theplanet.com
[70.84.187.39]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>And yes I've opened a support ticket but I'm not
getting anywhere with that :( I realize that trace route packets are low
priority blah blah but when it's consistent between a whole bunch of different
people and the ping is that high - I don't buy into that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anyways.......</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>--</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>NateDog</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> </DIV></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jayco1@charter.net href="mailto:jayco1@charter.net">Jay Vasallo</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=cod@icculus.org
href="mailto:cod@icculus.org">cod@icculus.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 20, 2005 9:41
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [cod] RHE4 new 2.6
Kernel</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hey Mark,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I rented a few servers from the planet last month
and have the same setup you do to the t. Works great. I also noticed that it
deals with swap mem a little different than the rhe3. But other than that,
runs fine. Did some research on the new file journaling but noticed a decrease
in productivity and increase in ping when i set the journaling to on so that
was a waste of time. But other than that, if you use it exactly the way the
planet gives it to you, the server rocks.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=defilm@acm.org href="mailto:defilm@acm.org">Mark J. DeFilippis</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=cod@icculus.org
href="mailto:cod@icculus.org">cod@icculus.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 20, 2005 9:23
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [cod] RHE4 new 2.6
Kernel</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR><BR>Anyone had experience with running the COD binaries
on the new RedHat Enterprise Server 4.0 with 2.6 SMP and threading
enhancements?<BR><BR>On theplanet.com, and servermatrix.com, there are a few
quotes here and there about "nice performance increase". (Actually I would
be happy if it is better than the existing ES3 SMP kernel which will often
run a cpu up to 100% while the other sits idle at 0%, after the major lag,
it kicks in. (yea! isn't that proactive!)<BR><BR>I am hoping 2.6
enhancements to RHE4 does the trick.<BR><BR>Anyone?<BR><BR>I did see some
issues with Teamspeak and issues with mysql. At the time of posting,
the admins recommended solution was to rev back up2date for the mysql
package to 4.0, and Teamspeak is a happy camper again.<BR><BR>Any input from
someone doing this already would be
appreciated.<BR><BR>Thanks<BR><BR>Md<BR><BR><X-SIGSEP>
<P></X-SIGSEP><TT>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>S1,Mark
J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE
defilm@acm.org<BR>
defilm@ieee.org<BR><BR><BR></TT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>