<html>
<body>
<br>
What nifty utility are U using to format that nice output list<br>
or is that a flat file, or you use command line args with a<br>
ps -el | <perl script, sed, awk, etc>?<br><br>
<br>
On a Dual Pent 4, 3.2Ghz HT, 2GB Ram, 100Mbs, (6 IP's) when my<br>
UO foy 24x7 fills up with 32 users (No limits on tanks or etc. It<br>
is Ladder compliant), ONE cpu runs at 60-80% (Combined Real<br>
and Virtual).<br><br>
I have 24 Man Rifles Only server running, and a BF1942 server<br>
32 user. The UO Rifles only will Lag if the BF1942 server and<br>
32 user FOY fill up. Of course they get really ticked off in the<br>
rifles only server, as the most skill is indeed required there...<br>
(You have a bolt action rifle, or you can bash the guy. No scopes,<br>
smg's, nades (except smoke)). So if they get lag, it can be<br>
pretty tough to hit a target, and becomes VERY frustrating<br>
quickly..<br><br>
I presume all these are not actually running at the same time?<br>
Also, I noticed some of your Max_rates are at 25K, some 15K.<br>
I never noticed much of a difference between 15K and 25K? But<br>
then again, I have not run as many virtual servers as you are.<br>
I ask, because if you set them lower, I presume you did so for<br>
a reason, or computed them and hence 15K vs default 25K?<br><br>
If you don't mind, can you tell us about this server?<br><br>
Physical... <br>
Your normal utilization? Peak utilization?<br>
Limiting Mods?<br><br>
I think the information could be insightful, certainly for me<br>
simply by the fact that when the UO server is full and the<br>
BF1942 are full, there is hardly any CPU left...<br><br>
Thanks<br><br>
Mark<br><br>
<br><br>
At 11:54 PM 12/2/2004, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>You can do a similar setup using
virtual IPs and assigning each game its own<br>
IP. Of course you need to "own" the IP you are
assigning. If you only have<br>
access to one IP then assigning the games different ports is the way to
go.<br><br>
Donovan<br><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: David A. Fuess
[<a href="mailto:david@fuess.net" eudora="autourl">mailto:david@fuess.net</a>]<br>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:27 PM<br>
To: cod@icculus.org<br>
Subject: Re: [cod] Multiple service server + Going off list due to<br>
"spamming"<br><br>
I run 3 UO servers on one machine along with several other game
types<br>
(1-UT2k4, 3-SOF2, 3-WET, 3 COD:UO, 1-CSS)<br><br>
Team Judge UT2004 67.18.122.226 7777 10000 24 8 ut4s xCTFGame
CTF-SMOTE<br>
Team Judge Public CTF 67.18.122.226 20100 15000 30 0 sof2s ctf
mp_kam4<br>
Team Judge Public Custom 67.18.122.226 20200 15000 30 0 sof2s ctf
mp_Italy3<br>
Team Judge L337 Match Server 67.18.122.226 20300 10000 20 0 sof2s
ctf<br>
arioche/mp_small<br>
Team Judge 9 Map Campaign ETPro 3.0 67.18.122.227 27960 25000 28 1 ets
et<br>
supplydepot<br>
Team Judge Custom/Stock 67.18.122.227 27961 100000 28 0 ets et
oasis<br>
Team Judge Match Server 67.18.122.227 27962 15000 18 0 ets et
battery<br>
Team Judge L337 COD/UO Server 67.18.122.228 28960 25000 24 5 cods
tdm<br>
mp_saint-rush<br>
Team Judge L337 COD/UO CTF-HQ 67.18.122.228 28961 25000 24 0 cods
ctf<br>
mp_cassino<br>
Team Judge L337 COD/UO Match 67.18.122.228 28962 25000 24 0 cods
dom<br>
mp_arnhem<br>
Team Judge L337 HL2 CS 67.18.122.229 27015 - 24 0 hl2s cs_italy<br><br>
You see the three UO servers are on ports 28960, 28961, and 28962.
Each<br>
game is a separate install on Linux so the connection is defined
uniquely<br>
for each.<br><br>
Dave<br><br>
At 01:46 PM 12/2/2004, you wrote:<br>
> People are so
sensitive. Ever hear of filters? This is nothing<br>
> compared to many many other list.<br>
><br>
><br>
>Anyway, to bring this back to on-topic.<br>
><br>
>I stumbled across one message here that mentioned running multiple
servers<br>
>on one machine. I assume you must set different port numbers
for them.<br>
><br>
>Can you run one as internet and the other as LAN?<br>
><br>
>I would also assume that the bandwidth calculations applies to
both<br>
>servers combined as well, correct?<br>
><br>
>So if I had a Pentium III 550 running Slackware Linux and it has 100
BaseT<br>
>connection to the world, my limitation would be the processing power
of<br>
>that machine?<br>
><br>
>It would also seem like CoD would do a lot of repetitive commands (on
the<br>
>programming level) that a processor with a large cache would be<br>
>best. Since AMD processors usually handle the repetitive
commands better<br>
>than Intel, would it not make more sense to run an AMD
processor?<br>
><br>
>Has anyone ran a Quake II server along side a CoD?<br>
><br>
>Thanks<br>
></blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<tt>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Mark J.
DeFilippis
defilm@acm.org<br>
defilm@ieee.org<br><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>