[cod] Off Topic: Bad Company 2
Midnight
midowns at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 20:35:13 EST 2010
This is all speculation but...
It's very contradictory, but my guess is that they want the few GSP's to
provide free community servers, which they are obligated to do. If they
gave it out to anyone to host they have no guarantee of that happening,
however there would be so many servers out there it wouldn't be an issue
anyway. Why this obligation is there I don't know. Since if they
wanted lots of free servers for ppl to play in then the smart thing is
to just let anyone host it.
As for cheating, not sure how it matters if they release the server
binaries or not on that front, but then I don't write cheat software.
If anything the biggest reason why this idea = fail is because of the
lack of competition. Since there are so few options in providers, if
you don't like yours you only have a handful to choose from, and they
all know this so they will all over stack their boxes to drive up
profits. Where you going to go if your server sucks? Another gsp who
also has lag. So essentially it just will make for laggy servers and
higher prices. Smart move.
Also if you look at the providers available, they are largely the who's
who of laggy server providers.
Caleb Stephens wrote:
> yeah I can't quite tell if it's an effort to reduce cheating (and have
> the ability to take corrective action and have enforcement authority)
> or if its a way to consolidate players and keep servers full ...
> thinking that it makes the player / user experience better. In truth
> it might be both. I can't think of very many other reasons why they
> would do this.
>
> I can understand the cheating argument. But I think this actually
> hurts a games popularity rather than helping it. Far more clans would
> get servers if they could get it from their existing server providers
> etc., or just simply run it on their own boxes. and it would be
> better for clans and players because it would be very price
> competitive, that would also encourage massive proliferation.
>
> Dunno ... I'm sure they modeled it out and it comes down to money.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Einar S. Idsø
> <einar.cod at norsk-esport.no <mailto:einar.cod at norsk-esport.no>> wrote:
>
> It helps to be in a country where there aren't a gazillion providers
> that are already "hooked up". Then size and age doesn't matter that
> much anymore.
>
> Cheers.
> Einar
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Oliver Warburton
> <olly at inx-gaming.co.uk <mailto:olly at inx-gaming.co.uk>> wrote:
> > I can concur!
> > It has nothing to do with meeting the requirements. We do and more.
> > We run just over 1000 game servers, as does a colleague on
> another brand
> > here in the UK. They aren't (able to) offering (offer) Bad
> Company 2 either.
> > From that I could tell, there's one host for example that have
> been running
> > a few months, run a handful of servers, and have been approved.
> > The requirement appears to be knowing the right person to talk to!
> > Oliver Warburton
> > Managing Director
> > INX-Network LTD
> > INX-Gaming.com
> > www.inx-gaming.com <http://www.inx-gaming.com>
> > Become a fan of INX on Facebook!
> > http://www.facebook.com/pages/INX-Gaming/11051264033
> > On 24 Feb 2010, at 17:42, Midnight wrote:
> >
> > You can't just meet the qualifications and get approved though.
> I meet the
> > requirements and then some.
> >
> > I had been inquiring since 6 months ago, however it seems just
> like most
> > things, you have to know the right people.
> >
> >
> > i3D.net - Ramon Plaiser wrote:
> >
> > Providers are selected on various qualifications. One of them is
> being able
> > to host on a windows platform. No Linux bins are available.
> >
> > No provider will (or is allowed) to make contractual agreements
> between them
> > and EA public. Different games have different requirements and
> > qualifications you need to meet to be considered as a ranked
> provider.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Ramon Plaisier
> > i3D.net Operations Manager
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: escapedturkey [mailto:escapedturkey at escapedturkey.com
> <mailto:escapedturkey at escapedturkey.com>]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:38 AM
> > To: Call of Duty server admin list.
> > Subject: Re: [cod] Off Topic: Bad Company 2
> >
> > Is what this person saying true?
> >
> > "To become an EA trusted partner:
> > EA requires you to give them 640 slots on 10 servers and you have to
> > sign a contract to serve them for 1 year. You also must give EA full
> > access to those machines in order to qualify. Also for every 10
> servers
> > you rent out you must provide EA 1 ranked server."
> >
> > http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/381849.html
> >
> > Midnight wrote:
> >
> >
> > They pick you. It's closed so you're too late like most gsp's
> sorry.
> >
> >
> > escapedturkey wrote:
> >
> >
> > How does one sign up to be a ranked server provider?
> >
> > Do the binarines support Linux?
> >
> > Thanks. :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cod mailing list
> cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cod mailing list
> cod at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20100224/b7aed5f0/attachment.htm>
More information about the cod
mailing list