[cod] Off Topic: Bad Company 2

[Caleb Stephens]

yeah I can't quite tell if it's an effort to reduce cheating (and have the
ability to take corrective action and have enforcement authority) or if its
a way to consolidate players and keep servers full ... thinking that it
makes the player / user experience better. In truth it might be both.  I
can't think of very many other reasons why they would do this.

I can understand the cheating argument.  But I think this actually hurts a
games popularity rather than helping it.  Far more clans would get servers
if they could get it from their existing server providers etc., or just
simply run it on their own boxes.  and it would be better for clans and
players because it would be very price competitive, that would also
encourage massive proliferation.

Dunno ... I'm sure they modeled it out and it comes down to money.




On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Einar S. Idsø <einar.cod at norsk-esport.no>wrote:

> It helps to be in a country where there aren't a gazillion providers
> that are already "hooked up". Then size and age doesn't matter that
> much anymore.
>
> Cheers.
> Einar
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Oliver Warburton <olly at inx-gaming.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > I can concur!
> > It has nothing to do with meeting the requirements. We do and more.
> > We run just over 1000 game servers, as does a colleague on another brand
> > here in the UK. They aren't (able to) offering (offer) Bad Company 2
> either.
> > From that I could tell, there's one host for example that have been
> running
> > a few months, run a handful of servers, and have been approved.
> > The requirement appears to be knowing the right person to talk to!
> > Oliver Warburton
> > Managing Director
> > INX-Network LTD
> > INX-Gaming.com
> > www.inx-gaming.com
> > Become a fan of INX on Facebook!
> > http://www.facebook.com/pages/INX-Gaming/11051264033
> > On 24 Feb 2010, at 17:42, Midnight wrote:
> >
> > You can't just meet the qualifications and get approved though.  I meet
> the
> > requirements and then some.
> >
> > I had been inquiring since 6 months ago, however it seems just like most
> > things, you have to know the right people.
> >
> >
> > i3D.net - Ramon Plaiser wrote:
> >
> > Providers are selected on various qualifications. One of them is being
> able
> > to host on a windows platform. No Linux bins are available.
> >
> > No provider will (or is allowed) to make contractual agreements between
> them
> > and EA public. Different games have different requirements and
> > qualifications you need to meet to be considered as a ranked provider.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Ramon Plaisier
> > i3D.net Operations Manager
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: escapedturkey [mailto:escapedturkey at escapedturkey.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:38 AM
> > To: Call of Duty server admin list.
> > Subject: Re: [cod] Off Topic: Bad Company 2
> >
> > Is what this person saying true?
> >
> > "To become an EA trusted partner:
> > EA requires you to give them 640 slots on 10 servers and you have to
> > sign a contract to serve them for 1 year. You also must give EA full
> > access to those machines in order to qualify. Also for every 10 servers
> > you rent out you must provide EA 1 ranked server."
> >
> > http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/381849.html
> >
> > Midnight wrote:
> >
> >
> > They pick you.  It's closed so you're too late like most gsp's sorry.
> >
> >
> > escapedturkey wrote:
> >
> >
> > How does one sign up to be a ranked server provider?
> >
> > Do the binarines support Linux?
> >
> > Thanks. :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cod mailing list
> > cod at icculus.org
> > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cod mailing list
> cod at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/cod
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20100224/ffde3a52/attachment-0001.htm>