No subject
Wed Mar 11 16:46:39 EDT 2009
n
they have represented themselves. If they handled their business they wa=
y
Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (not to mention a bet=
ter
game) months ago.
Everything Ryan has done to date has been more than fine by me.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: colin at bell-pc.com [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM
To: cod at icculus.org
Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
ah I see ha ha !
Well they need to give him some overtime and a completion bonus incentiv=
e me
thinks :p
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a damn LOL
>
> Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work for them, he is a pa=
id=20
> sub
> contractor, thus their approval.
>
> -Jim
> Rudedog
> FPSadmin.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: colin at bell-pc.com [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:01 AM
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
> So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt support the Linux serv=
er
> version and then delay the release untill Activision approve it=3F=3F=
=3F=3F . May
> aswell just release it, if thats the case
>
> Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it or not=3F=3F
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Michelle E" <michelle=5Fs4f at hotmail.co.uk>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
>
>>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any day now...they're done, we're just
>>waiting for Activision to approve them'
>> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...or am i missing
>> somethiing=3F
>>
>>>From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net>
>>>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org
>>>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400
>>>
>>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do much until he has the final=
=20
>>>code,
>>>Then that's when all his fun starts ;)
>>>
>>>-Jim
>>>Rudedog
>>>FPSadmin.com
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Michelle E [mailto:michelle=5Fs4f at hotmail.co.uk]
>>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM
>>>To: cod at icculus.org
>>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>>
>>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release=3F
>>>
>>>
>>> >From: Dave Whitney <whitney321 at yahoo.com>
>>> >Reply-To: cod at icculus.org
>>> >To: cod at icculus.org
>>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
>>> >
>>> >Last fall, I think is was almost 2 weeks before the beta got leaked=
,=20
>>> >and
>>> >then a month for the final release.
>>> >
>>> >Frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz> wrote: Not so sure about that, but i=
t
>>> >took
>>> >several weeks that time -
>>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...
>>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:
>>> >
>>> > > Ola all,
>>> > >
>>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took during vcod and uo or even
>>> > > with the
>>> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries approved=3F
>>> > >
>>> > > That might give a good indication for how long we all will have =
to
>>> > > wait.
>>> > >
>>> > > And looking at the IWN forums, they all are getting crazy now
>>> > > waiting again
>>> > > for ACTV to approve for the last part of the patch to get all th=
eir
>>> > > servers
>>> > > running;-)
>>> > > It is almost hilarious on that forum and every body flaming
>>> > > constantly to
>>> > > IW/AV.
>>> > >
>>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod gamers are happy that at
>>> > > least you
>>> > > give us the support which we should actually get from IW/AV for =
al
>>> > > those
>>> > > linux boxes that run cod2.
>>> > >
>>> > > MacBooom
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >---------------------------------
>>> >Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Gre=
at
>>>rates
>>>
>>> >starting at 1¢/min.
>>>
>>>=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
>>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search!
>>>http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
>> Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger=3F Download MSN Mes=
senger
>> 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
>>
>>
>>
>> --=20
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/=
2006
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --=20
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2=
006
>
>=20
=20
------------respect-the-roots-a52a57057e200cca3e1af5cadd0329e6
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN'>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D'Content-Type' content=3D'text/html;charset=3Dus-asc=
ii'>
<style>BODY{font:10pt Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif;}</style>
</head>
<body>
Ryan is not the IW represent he is the Linux community friend... I know =
his work from the early days (think mohaa etc.) And he was always =
the life saver for all those company's.. He made it possible that the ga=
me selling is still happening for a lot of games. <br><br>So i thing no =
bonus... Give the man a percentage of the selling of those games...;-)<b=
r><br>And for the problem of leaking the beta, we don't have to forget p=
unkbuster is part of the code so i think from the view of security this =
is the delay. We don't want hackers etc. etc. break the anticheat, then =
we have again a game like mohaa...No anticheat full of cheaters..:-(<br>=
<br>Cheers<br>Quint<br><br><blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid r=
gb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">=
<hr><b>From:</b> LeadBritches [mailto:leadbritches at austinservers.com]<br=
><b>To:</b> cod at icculus.org<br><b>Sent:</b> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:45:35 +0=
200<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took<br><b=
r><!-- -->From my experience here... Ryan has represented IW/Activision =
better than<br>they have represented themselves. If they handled their b=
usiness they way<br>Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (=
not to mention a better<br>game) months ago.<br><br>Everything Ryan has =
done to date has been more than fine by me. <br><br>-----Original Messag=
e-----<br>From: <a href=3D"mailto:colin at bell-pc.com">colin at bell-pc.com</=
a> [mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:colin at bell-pc.com">colin at bell-pc.com</a>] <=
br>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM<br>To: <a href=3D"mailto:cod at i=
cculus.org">cod at icculus.org</a><br>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st c=
od2 binary took<br><br>ah I see ha ha !<br>Well they need to give him so=
me overtime and a completion bonus incentive me<br><br>thinks :p<br><br=
><br><br>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: "James Landi" <<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:jim at landi.net">jim at landi.net</a>><br>To: <<a href=3D"m=
ailto:cod at icculus.org">cod at icculus.org</a>><br>Sent: Thursday, April =
13, 2006 1:20 PM<br>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took=
<br><br><br>> Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a da=
mn LOL<br>><br>> Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work=
for them, he is a paid <br>> sub<br>> contractor, thus their appr=
oval.<br>><br>> -Jim<br>> Rudedog<br>> FPSadmin.com<br>><=
br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: <a href=3D"mailto:colin=
@bell-pc.com">colin at bell-pc.com</a> [mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:colin at bell=
-pc.com">colin at bell-pc.com</a>]<br>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8=
:01 AM<br>> To: <a href=3D"mailto:cod at icculus.org">cod at icculus.org</a=
><br>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took<br>><b=
r>> So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt support the Linux=
server<br>> version and then delay the release untill Activision app=
rove it=3F=3F=3F=3F . May<br>> aswell just release it, if thats the c=
ase<br>><br>> Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it=
or not=3F=3F<br>><br>><br>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>&=
gt; From: "Michelle E" <<a href=3D"mailto:michelle=5Fs4f at hotmail.co.u=
k">michelle=5Fs4f at hotmail.co.uk</a>><br>> To: <<a href=3D"mailt=
o:cod at icculus.org">cod at icculus.org</a>><br>> Sent: Thursday, April=
13, 2006 12:50 PM<br>> Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 bina=
ry took<br>><br>><br>>>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any da=
y now...they're done, we're just<br>>>waiting for Activision to ap=
prove them'<br>>> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...=
or am i missing<br>>> somethiing=3F<br>>><br>>>>Fro=
m: "James Landi" <<a href=3D"mailto:jim at landi.net">jim at landi.net</a>&=
gt;<br>>>>Reply-To: <a href=3D"mailto:cod at icculus.org">cod at iccu=
lus.org</a><br>>>>To: <<a href=3D"mailto:cod at icculus.org">co=
d at icculus.org</a>><br>>>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st=
cod2 binary took<br>>>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400<b=
r>>>><br>>>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do m=
uch until he has the final <br>>>>code,<br>>>>Then tha=
t's when all his fun starts ;)<br>>>><br>>>>-Jim<br>&g=
t;>>Rudedog<br>>>>FPSadmin.com<br>>>><br>>>=
;>-----Original Message-----<br>>>>From: Michelle E [mailto:=
<a href=3D"mailto:michelle=5Fs4f at hotmail.co.uk">michelle=5Fs4f at hotmail.c=
o.uk</a>]<br>>>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM<br>>&=
gt;>To: <a href=3D"mailto:cod at icculus.org">cod at icculus.org</a><br>>=
;>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took<br>>>=
;><br>>>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release=
=3F<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> >From: Dave Whitn=
ey <<a href=3D"mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com">whitney321 at yahoo.com</a>&=
gt;<br>>>> >Reply-To: <a href=3D"mailto:cod at icculus.org">cod=
@icculus.org</a><br>>>> >To: <a href=3D"mailto:cod at icculus.o=
rg">cod at icculus.org</a><br>>>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long =
1st cod2 binary took<br>>>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48=
-0700 (PDT)<br>>>> ><br>>>> >Last fall, I think=
is was almost 2 weeks before the beta got leaked, <br>>>> >=
and<br>>>> >then a month for the final release.<br>>>&=
gt; ><br>>>> >Frenton <<a href=3D"mailto:frenton at orcon=
.net.nz">frenton at orcon.net.nz</a>> wrote: Not so sure about that, but=
it<br>>>> >took<br>>>> >several weeks that time=
-<br>>>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...<br=
>>>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:<br=
>>>> ><br>>>> > > Ola all,<br>>>> &g=
t; ><br>>>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took =
during vcod and uo or even<br>>>> > > with the<br>>>=
;> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries approved=3F=
<br>>>> > ><br>>>> > > That might give a g=
ood indication for how long we all will have to<br>>>> > >=
; wait.<br>>>> > ><br>>>> > > And looking =
at the IWN forums, they all are getting crazy now<br>>>> > &=
gt; waiting again<br>>>> > > for ACTV to approve for the =
last part of the patch to get all their<br>>>> > > server=
s<br>>>> > > running;-)<br>>>> > > It is a=
lmost hilarious on that forum and every body flaming<br>>>> >=
; > constantly to<br>>>> > > IW/AV.<br>>>> &g=
t; ><br>>>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod=
gamers are happy that at<br>>>> > > least you<br>>>=
;> > > give us the support which we should actually get from IW=
/AV for al<br>>>> > > those<br>>>> > > lin=
ux boxes that run cod2.<br>>>> > ><br>>>> > &=
gt; MacBooom<br>>>> > ><br>>>> ><br>>>&=
gt; ><br>>>> ><br>>>> ><br>>>> >-=
--------------------------------<br>>>> >Talk is cheap. Use =
Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great<br>>>>rates<=
br>>>><br>>>> >starting at 1&cent;/min.<br>>=
>><br>>>>=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F<br>>>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop searc=
h!<br>>>><a href=3D"http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview" targe=
t=3D"=5Fblank">http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview</a><br>>>><=
br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>><br>>> =
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F<br>>> Are you =
using the latest version of MSN Messenger=3F Download MSN Messenger<br>&=
gt;> 7.5 today! <a href=3D"http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview" ta=
rget=3D"=5Fblank">http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview</a><br>>>=
<br>>><br>>><br>>> -- <br>>> No virus found in t=
his incoming message.<br>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.<br>>&g=
t; Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/=
2006<br>>><br>>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>=
><br>> -- <br>> No virus found in this incoming message.<br>>=
; Checked by AVG Free Edition.<br>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database=
: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2006<br>><br>> <br><br><br><br=
><!-- --><style>
</style>
</blockquote></body></html>
------------respect-the-roots-a52a57057e200cca3e1af5cadd0329e6--
More information about the cod
mailing list