[cod] Laag with 1.7 Linux Servers?

[|T-OC|Morpheus|:.Web]

Maybe some punkbuster problem, as a friend showed me, punkbuster code is 
very ugly, with lots of jumps, maybe too many for being useful. But for 
me, it is happening on all CoD2 and CoD4 servers...

Benedikt Schmidt a écrit :
> suse 10.1 over here - lags are here since 1.7. but the lag is not 
> serversided .it seems to be due heavyscreenshot transfer,  but y now?
>
> |T-OC|Morpheus|:.Web schrieb:
>> He's running a 64bit kernel (AMD64 and EMT64 are the same things) ;) 
>> For my servers I'm running 32bit under Etch.
>>
>> Kenny Southpark a écrit :
>>> what is with the amd64 stuff in your debain name and kernel version 
>>> when you say you are running an Xeon CPU?
>>>  
>>> ~kennycom
>>>
>>> > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:38:55 +0200
>>> > From: jordzz at gmail.com
>>> > To: cod at icculus.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [cod] Laag with 1.7 Linux Servers?
>>> >
>>> > I have that to on 1 server, the rest is running fine, all on the 
>>> same server.
>>> > I thought it had something to do with punkbuster taking screenshots,
>>> > but maybe that's not the case..
>>> >
>>> > Debian 4.0 amd64: 2.6.24-1-amd64 @ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3210 @ 
>>> 2.13GHz
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:30 PM, |T-OC|Morpheus|:.Web
>>> > <morpheus at clantoc.org> wrote:
>>> > > I have this kind of "freeze" with cod2 too, so I don't think 
>>> it's coming
>>> > > specifically from the binary. Should be with kernel, as using a 
>>> more recent
>>> > > one (2.6.25.6 with SMP, PREEMPT, 1000Hz, to stay short) reduces the
>>> > > frequency of these lags (but they're still present). Or a 
>>> combination with
>>> > > binary, glibc, kernel (plus hardware ?) ...
>>> > >
>>> > > Anyway information about compilation environment is always good 
>>> to know ;)
>>> > >
>>> > > Thomas Toka / www.serverman.de a écrit :
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi ladies,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> anyone else having short massive lags with 1.7 linux servers.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I use a 1000Hz RT Kernel 2.25.5 an Gentoo with GCC 4.2.3 and 
>>> glibc 2.6.1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Seems for me as there were some changes.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Ryan can you give us some informations what the binarys are 
>>> optimized for?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Tom-i
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> ---
>>> > >> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>> > >> Mailing list archives: 
>>> http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ---
>>> > > To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>> > > Mailing list archives: 
>>> http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>> > Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>> It’s a talkathon – but it’s not just talk. Check out the i’m 
>>> Talkathon. 
>>> <http://www.imtalkathon.com/?source=EML_WLH_Talkathon_JustTalk>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>
>