[cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...

evolutioncrazy at gmail.com evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 11:20:46 EST 2008


if you have problems with the crap, just unsubscribe...

what else are you expecting from this ML???

some tweaked configs for players???

inx acount ha scritto:
> Not again i dont believe it i open my email and there is a load of 
> pointless crap being recieved please stop with all the shit they will 
> be out when there out.
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>
>     *To:* cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>     *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2008 4:11 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: [cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...
>
>     We want AN ANSWER.
>
>     I'm not asking for the binaries themself...
>
>     I want just to know if I've to say to all the ppl: stick to
>     cod2/cod4 as cod5 will not be supported by us
>
>     or if we should keep saying as now: "we are sorry, we put you in
>     the waiting list, we will mail you as soon as activision will
>     allow us to set up your gameserver".
>
>     Can we pretend an answer???
>
>     I understood (seeing the past of linux binaries releases) that
>     hoping for a linux release in DECENT TIME is IMPOSSIBLE with
>     activions... but a reply shouldn't be that hard!
>
>     c0m4r ha scritto:
>>     Guys, calm down, there is nothing we can do about it.
>>
>>     ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
>>     Od: "[NTHW]Cerby" <chillip at gmail.com>
>>     Do: cod at icculus.org
>>     Data: 8 grudnia 2008 17:01
>>     Temat: Re: [cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...
>>
>>       
>>>     They don&#39;t even have email to a press office. OMG! He just saidcontact Treyarch. Hang on a moment, Treyarch is owned by Activisionis it not?
>>>     On 08/12/2008, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com &lt;evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt; wrote:nice, let us know :)
>>>     have you tried spelling L-I-N-U-X? :D
>>>     [NTHW]Cerby ha scritto:On the phone to Activision just now to see if I can get somefurther information. As yet the advisor who answered my call, whoadvised that he has no idea what I was talking about and who Icould speak to. He also said it&#39;s down to the devlopers of thegame, aka Treyarch.
>>>     On 08/12/2008, James Landi &lt;jim at landi.net&gt; wrote:We (Jock, PSTjoker, Garetjax and myself) had Josh (the communitymanager for Treyarch) last night (Bashandslash.com round table). When asked about a patch he said, not sure but I would guessafter the holidays as everyone is on vacation now or soon.
>>>     We also brought up the linux bits and was told they are betweenRyan and Activision QA (ryan fixing things as Act finds bugs). if you put 1 and 1 together you can see that it may take the1.2 patch for the linux bits to be released.  Thus after thenew years.
>>>     Again take this with a grain of salt, as it&#39;s not a so calledofficial word but a speculative response from someone at TreyarchNOT WORKING on the game (code wise) so to speak.
>>>     -Jim Landi
>>>     Rudedog
>>>     FPSadmin.com
>>>     John Kennington wrote:
>>>     You see, that is the question.  If he patched to 1.2, then itwill be delayed until after Jan 1.  If he didn&#39;t then ATVIis on vacation and the patch will not be released until they getback.
>>>     On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt; &lt;evolutioncrazy at gmail.com &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;&gt; wrote:
>>>        they can delay the 1.2 path to the 2015 ... I do notcare...
>>>        I&#39;m just waiting a linux dedicated binary :|
>>>        Did ryan ported directly the 1.2 so we will have towait till the
>>>        1.2 will be officially released? :|
>>>        John Kennington ha scritto:
>>>            There is a rumor floating around, I sawit at pbbans, that
>>>            patch 1.2 has been delayed until afterJan 1, 09.  It seems
>>>            that everyone is taking vacation. I wonder if they know what
>>>            they have done.
>>>            John
>>>            On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>>            &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;
>>>            &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>>            &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;&gt; &lt;evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>>            &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;
>>>            &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>>            &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;&gt;&gt; wrote:
>>>               What&#39;s the problem with theQA team?
>>>               wasn&#39;t the quality goodenough? :(
>>>            --        &quot;Somepeople are like a Slinky .. Not really good for
>>>            anything, but you still can&#39;t helpbut smile when you shove
>>>            them down the stairs.&quot;
>>>        ---
>>>        To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>>        &lt;mailto:cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org&gt;
>>>        Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>>     --
>>>     &quot;Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good foranything, but you still can&#39;t help but smile when you shovethem down the stairs.&quot;
>>>     ---
>>>     To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>>     Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>>         
>>
>>
>>     ---
>>     To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>     Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>
>>
>>       
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20081208/827706ad/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cod mailing list