[cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...
Georgecooldude
georgecooldude at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 11:18:40 EST 2008
With all due respect we've had the "loads of mail" discussion conversation
multiple times. Please refer to those mails for solutions.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:16 PM, inx acount <games67 at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Not again i dont believe it i open my email and there is a load of
> pointless crap being recieved please stop with all the shit they will be out
> when there out.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
> *To:* cod at icculus.org
> *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2008 4:11 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...
>
> We want AN ANSWER.
>
> I'm not asking for the binaries themself...
>
> I want just to know if I've to say to all the ppl: stick to cod2/cod4 as
> cod5 will not be supported by us
>
> or if we should keep saying as now: "we are sorry, we put you in the
> waiting list, we will mail you as soon as activision will allow us to set up
> your gameserver".
>
> Can we pretend an answer???
>
> I understood (seeing the past of linux binaries releases) that hoping for a
> linux release in DECENT TIME is IMPOSSIBLE with activions... but a reply
> shouldn't be that hard!
>
> c0m4r ha scritto:
>
> Guys, calm down, there is nothing we can do about it.
>
> ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
> Od: "[NTHW]Cerby" <chillip at gmail.com> <chillip at gmail.com>
> Do: cod at icculus.org
> Data: 8 grudnia 2008 17:01
> Temat: Re: [cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...
>
>
>
> They don't even have email to a press office. OMG! He just saidcontact Treyarch. Hang on a moment, Treyarch is owned by Activisionis it not?
> On 08/12/2008, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <lt%3Bevolutioncrazy at gmail.com>> wrote:nice, let us know :)
> have you tried spelling L-I-N-U-X? :D
> [NTHW]Cerby ha scritto:On the phone to Activision just now to see if I can get somefurther information. As yet the advisor who answered my call, whoadvised that he has no idea what I was talking about and who Icould speak to. He also said it's down to the devlopers of thegame, aka Treyarch.
> On 08/12/2008, James Landi <jim at landi.net <lt%3Bjim at landi.net>> wrote:We (Jock, PSTjoker, Garetjax and myself) had Josh (the communitymanager for Treyarch) last night (Bashandslash.com round table). When asked about a patch he said, not sure but I would guessafter the holidays as everyone is on vacation now or soon.
> We also brought up the linux bits and was told they are betweenRyan and Activision QA (ryan fixing things as Act finds bugs). if you put 1 and 1 together you can see that it may take the1.2 patch for the linux bits to be released. Thus after thenew years.
> Again take this with a grain of salt, as it's not a so calledofficial word but a speculative response from someone at TreyarchNOT WORKING on the game (code wise) so to speak.
> -Jim Landi
> Rudedog
> FPSadmin.com
> John Kennington wrote:
> You see, that is the question. If he patched to 1.2, then itwill be delayed until after Jan 1. If he didn't then ATVIis on vacation and the patch will not be released until they getback.
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com%3E>; <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <lt%3Bevolutioncrazy at gmail.com> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com%3E%3E>; wrote:
> they can delay the 1.2 path to the 2015 ... I do notcare...
> I'm just waiting a linux dedicated binary :|
> Did ryan ported directly the 1.2 so we will have towait till the
> 1.2 will be officially released? :|
> John Kennington ha scritto:
> There is a rumor floating around, I sawit at pbbans, that
> patch 1.2 has been delayed until afterJan 1, 09. It seems
> that everyone is taking vacation. I wonder if they know what
> they have done.
> John
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com%3E>;
> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>
> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com%3E%3E>; <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <lt%3Bevolutioncrazy at gmail.com>
> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com%3E>;
> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>
> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>>> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com%3E%3E%3E>; wrote:
> What's the problem with theQA team?
> wasn't the quality goodenough? :(
> -- "Somepeople are like a Slinky .. Not really good for
> anything, but you still can't helpbut smile when you shove
> them down the stairs."
> ---
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
> <mailto:cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org> <cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org%3E>;
> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
> --
> "Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good foranything, but you still can't help but smile when you shovethem down the stairs."
> ---
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20081208/00b0dc70/attachment.htm>
More information about the Cod
mailing list