Re: Re: [cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...

[c0m4r]

Guys, calm down, there is nothing we can do about it.

---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
Od: "[NTHW]Cerby" <chillip at gmail.com>
Do: cod at icculus.org
Data: 8 grudnia 2008 17:01
Temat: Re: [cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...

> They don&#39;t even have email to a press office. OMG! He just saidcontact Treyarch. Hang on a moment, Treyarch is owned by Activisionis it not?
> On 08/12/2008, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com &lt;evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt; wrote:nice, let us know :)
> have you tried spelling L-I-N-U-X? :D
> [NTHW]Cerby ha scritto:On the phone to Activision just now to see if I can get somefurther information. As yet the advisor who answered my call, whoadvised that he has no idea what I was talking about and who Icould speak to. He also said it&#39;s down to the devlopers of thegame, aka Treyarch.
> On 08/12/2008, James Landi &lt;jim at landi.net&gt; wrote:We (Jock, PSTjoker, Garetjax and myself) had Josh (the communitymanager for Treyarch) last night (Bashandslash.com round table). When asked about a patch he said, not sure but I would guessafter the holidays as everyone is on vacation now or soon.
> We also brought up the linux bits and was told they are betweenRyan and Activision QA (ryan fixing things as Act finds bugs). if you put 1 and 1 together you can see that it may take the1.2 patch for the linux bits to be released.  Thus after thenew years.
> Again take this with a grain of salt, as it&#39;s not a so calledofficial word but a speculative response from someone at TreyarchNOT WORKING on the game (code wise) so to speak.
> -Jim Landi
> Rudedog
> FPSadmin.com
> John Kennington wrote:
> You see, that is the question.  If he patched to 1.2, then itwill be delayed until after Jan 1.  If he didn&#39;t then ATVIis on vacation and the patch will not be released until they getback.
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt; &lt;evolutioncrazy at gmail.com &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;&gt; wrote:
>    they can delay the 1.2 path to the 2015 ... I do notcare...
>    I&#39;m just waiting a linux dedicated binary :|
>    Did ryan ported directly the 1.2 so we will have towait till the
>    1.2 will be officially released? :|
>    John Kennington ha scritto:
>        There is a rumor floating around, I sawit at pbbans, that
>        patch 1.2 has been delayed until afterJan 1, 09.  It seems
>        that everyone is taking vacation. I wonder if they know what
>        they have done.
>        John
>        On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>        &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;
>        &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>        &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;&gt; &lt;evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>        &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;
>        &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>        &lt;mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com&gt;&gt;&gt; wrote:
>           What&#39;s the problem with theQA team?
>           wasn&#39;t the quality goodenough? :(
>        --        &quot;Somepeople are like a Slinky .. Not really good for
>        anything, but you still can&#39;t helpbut smile when you shove
>        them down the stairs.&quot;
>    ---
>    To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>    &lt;mailto:cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org&gt;
>    Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
> --
> &quot;Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good foranything, but you still can&#39;t help but smile when you shovethem down the stairs.&quot;
> ---
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38