[cod] CoD:WAW... still nothing on linux front...
[NTHW]Cerby
chillip at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 11:01:42 EST 2008
They don't even have email to a press office. OMG! He just said contact
Treyarch. Hang on a moment, Treyarch is owned by Activision is it not?
On 08/12/2008, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> nice, let us know :)
>
> have you tried spelling L-I-N-U-X? :D
>
> [NTHW]Cerby ha scritto:
>
> On the phone to Activision just now to see if I can get some further
> information. As yet the advisor who answered my call, who advised that he
> has no idea what I was talking about and who I could speak to. He also said
> it's down to the devlopers of the game, aka Treyarch.
>
> On 08/12/2008, James Landi <jim at landi.net> wrote:
>>
>> We (Jock, PSTjoker, Garetjax and myself) had Josh (the community manager
>> for Treyarch) last night (Bashandslash.com round table). When asked about a
>> patch he said, not sure but I would guess after the holidays as everyone is
>> on vacation now or soon.
>>
>> We also brought up the linux bits and was told they are between Ryan and
>> Activision QA (ryan fixing things as Act finds bugs). if you put 1 and 1
>> together you can see that it may take the 1.2 patch for the linux bits to be
>> released. Thus after the new years.
>>
>> Again take this with a grain of salt, as it's not a so called official
>> word but a speculative response from someone at Treyarch NOT WORKING on the
>> game (code wise) so to speak.
>>
>> -Jim Landi
>> Rudedog
>> FPSadmin.com
>>
>> John Kennington wrote:
>>
>>> You see, that is the question. If he patched to 1.2, then it will be
>>> delayed until after Jan 1. If he didn't then ATVI is on vacation and the
>>> patch will not be released until they get back.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <mailto:
>>> evolutioncrazy at gmail.com> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com <mailto:
>>> evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> they can delay the 1.2 path to the 2015 ... I do not care...
>>>
>>> I'm just waiting a linux dedicated binary :|
>>>
>>> Did ryan ported directly the 1.2 so we will have to wait till the
>>> 1.2 will be officially released? :|
>>>
>>> John Kennington ha scritto:
>>>
>>> There is a rumor floating around, I saw it at pbbans, that
>>> patch 1.2 has been delayed until after Jan 1, 09. It seems
>>> that everyone is taking vacation. I wonder if they know what
>>> they have done.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>> <evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:evolutioncrazy at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What's the problem with the QA team?
>>>
>>> wasn't the quality good enough? :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- "Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for
>>> anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove
>>> them down the stairs."
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>> <mailto:cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org>
>>> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "Some people are like a Slinky .. Not really good for anything, but you
>>> still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs."
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20081208/80c29f66/attachment.htm>
More information about the Cod
mailing list