[cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
Fredric Ollikala
Fredric at onlinecenter.se
Thu Apr 13 16:22:54 EDT 2006
....
----- Original Message -----
From: <colin at bell-pc.com>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> "microslut" lol
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randy Wheeler" <randywheeler at gmail.com>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
>
>> Blame the devlopers Linux is always secondary in thought
>> Too bad John Carmack is slowly retiring he was the only one
>> to stand up against Mircoslut and tell them you put OpenGl in
>> windows or ID's game will not run on windows..
>>
>> everyone else just kisses Micronutts arse
>>
>>
>> On 4/13/06, colin at bell-pc.com <colin at bell-pc.com> wrote:
>>> la de da ..pff whats the problem ..where is it? has the anti christ mr
>>> gates
>>> won ? is Linux dead?
>>>
>>> :p
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>
>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:57 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>>
>>>
>>> > I'll come along with you....hehehe
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>From: <colin at bell-pc.com>
>>> >>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org
>>> >>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:55:36 +0100
>>> >>
>>> >>Ah so PB obviously have the new cod2_lnxded bin, Think ill go make
>>> >>friends
>>> >>with them he he
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Lumo" <lumo at gmen-clan.de>
>>> >>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:12 PM
>>> >>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>Well, the PB-files are already finished.
>>> >>>Server + Client
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Take a look here:
>>> >>>http://www.evenbalance.com/index.php?page=dl-cod2.php
>>> >>>
>>> >>>So i think we are waiting for the Gamefile cod2_lnxded now ...
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>colin at bell-pc.com schrieb:
>>> >>>>I would have thought the security of PB anticheat was the makers of
>>> >>>>PB's
>>> >>>>problem not Ryan's , Activisions , IW's problem
>>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> *From:* Dave Whitney <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>
>>> >>>> *To:* cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:19 PM
>>> >>>> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> This is a really good point. The more I think of this, the
>>> >>>> more
>>> >>>> it makes sense.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> */Cod Admin <cod at se-easy.net <mailto:cod at se-easy.net>>/* wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> And for the problem of leaking the beta, we don't have to
>>> >>>> forget punkbuster is part of the code so i think from the
>>> >>>> view
>>> >>>> of security this is the delay. We don't want hackers etc.
>>> >>>> etc.
>>> >>>> break the anticheat, then we have again a game like
>>> >>>> mohaa...No
>>> >>>> anticheat full of cheaters..:-(
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cheers
>>> >>>> Quint
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> *From:* LeadBritches
>>> >>>> [mailto:leadbritches at austinservers.com]
>>> >>>> *To:* cod at icculus.org
>>> >>>> *Sent:* Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:45:35 +0200
>>> >>>> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> From my experience here... Ryan has represented
>>> >>>> IW/Activision better than
>>> >>>> they have represented themselves. If they handled their
>>> >>>> business they way
>>> >>>> Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (not
>>> >>>> to
>>> >>>> mention a better
>>> >>>> game) months ago.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Everything Ryan has done to date has been more than
>>> >>>> fine
>>> >>>> by me.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> >>>> From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>>> >>>> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM
>>> >>>> To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> ah I see ha ha !
>>> >>>> Well they need to give him some overtime and a
>>> >>>> completion
>>> >>>> bonus incentive me
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> thinks :p
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>> From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net
>>> >>>> <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>>> >>>> To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:20 PM
>>> >>>> Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> > Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a
>>> >>>> damn LOL
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work for
>>> >>>> them, he is a paid
>>> >>>> > sub
>>> >>>> > contractor, thus their approval.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > -Jim
>>> >>>> > Rudedog
>>> >>>> > FPSadmin.com
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >>>> > From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>>> >>>> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>>> >>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:01 AM
>>> >>>> > To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> > Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt
>>> >>>> support
>>> >>>> the Linux server
>>> >>>> > version and then delay the release untill Activision
>>> >>>> approve it???? . May
>>> >>>> > aswell just release it, if thats the case
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it
>>> >>>> or
>>> >>>> not??
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>> > From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>>> >>>> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>>
>>> >>>> > To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>>> >>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:50 PM
>>> >>>> > Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any day now...they're
>>> >>>> done, we're just
>>> >>>> >>waiting for Activision to approve them'
>>> >>>> >> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...or
>>> >>>> am i
>>> >>>> missing
>>> >>>> >> somethiing?
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>>From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net
>>> >>>> <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>>> >>>> >>>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> >>>To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>>> >>>> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>> >>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do much until
>>> >>>> he
>>> >>>> has the final
>>> >>>> >>>code,
>>> >>>> >>>Then that's when all his fun starts ;)
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>-Jim
>>> >>>> >>>Rudedog
>>> >>>> >>>FPSadmin.com
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>-----Original Message-----
>>> >>>> >>>From: Michelle E [mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>>> >>>> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>]
>>> >>>> >>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM
>>> >>>> >>>To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release?
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> >From: Dave Whitney <whitney321 at yahoo.com
>>> >>>> <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>>
>>> >>>> >>> >Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> >>> >To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>>> >>>> >>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>> >>>> >>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> >Last fall, I think is was almost 2 weeks before
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> beta got leaked,
>>> >>>> >>> >and
>>> >>>> >>> >then a month for the final release.
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> >Frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz
>>> >>>> <mailto:frenton at orcon.net.nz>> wrote: Not so sure about
>>> >>>> that, but it
>>> >>>> >>> >took
>>> >>>> >>> >several weeks that time -
>>> >>>> >>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...
>>> >>>> >>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb
>>> >>>> ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> > > Ola all,
>>> >>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>> >>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took during
>>> >>>> vcod
>>> >>>> and uo or even
>>> >>>> >>> > > with the
>>> >>>> >>> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries
>>> >>>> approved?
>>> >>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>> >>> > > That might give a good indication for how long
>>> >>>> we
>>> >>>> all will have to
>>> >>>> >>> > > wait.
>>> >>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>> >>> > > And looking at the IWN forums, they all are
>>> >>>> getting crazy now
>>> >>>> >>> > > waiting again
>>> >>>> >>> > > for ACTV to approve for the last part of the
>>> >>>> patch
>>> >>>> to get all their
>>> >>>> >>> > > servers
>>> >>>> >>> > > running;-)
>>> >>>> >>> > > It is almost hilarious on that forum and every
>>> >>>> body flaming
>>> >>>> >>> > > constantly to
>>> >>>> >>> > > IW/AV.
>>> >>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>> >>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod gamers
>>> >>>> are
>>> >>>> happy that at
>>> >>>> >>> > > least you
>>> >>>> >>> > > give us the support which we should actually
>>> >>>> get
>>> >>>> from IW/AV for al
>>> >>>> >>> > > those
>>> >>>> >>> > > linux boxes that run cod2.
>>> >>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>> >>> > > MacBooom
>>> >>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> >
>>> >>>> >>> >---------------------------------
>>> >>>> >>> >Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make
>>> >>>> PC-to-Phone calls. Great
>>> >>>> >>>rates
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> >starting at 1¢/min.
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> >>>_________________________________________________________________
>>> >>>> >>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop
>>> >>>> search!
>>> >>>> >>>http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>> >>>> >> Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger?
>>> >>>> Download MSN Messenger
>>> >>>> >> 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> --
>>> >>>> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> >>>> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> >>>> >> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
>>> >>>> Release Date: 12/04/2006
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > --
>>> >>>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> >>>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> >>>> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
>>> >>>> Release
>>> >>>> Date: 12/04/2006
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Blab-away for as little as 1�/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
>>> >>>> using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> >>>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>>> >>>> 12/04/2006
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>--
>>> >>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> >>>Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>>> >>>12/04/2006
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>> > Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free
>>> > newsletters!
>>> > http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>>> > 12/04/2006
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2006
>
>
More information about the Cod
mailing list