[cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took

colin at bell-pc.com colin at bell-pc.com
Thu Apr 13 16:19:11 EDT 2006


"microslut" lol

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randy Wheeler" <randywheeler at gmail.com>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took


> Blame the devlopers Linux is always secondary in thought
> Too bad John Carmack is slowly retiring he was the only one
> to stand up against Mircoslut and tell them you put OpenGl in
> windows or ID's game will not run on windows..
>
> everyone else just kisses Micronutts arse
>
>
> On 4/13/06, colin at bell-pc.com <colin at bell-pc.com> wrote:
>> la de da ..pff whats the problem ..where is it? has the anti christ mr 
>> gates
>> won ? is Linux dead?
>>
>> :p
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>
>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>
>>
>> > I'll come along with you....hehehe
>> >
>> >
>> >>From: <colin at bell-pc.com>
>> >>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org
>> >>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> >>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:55:36 +0100
>> >>
>> >>Ah so PB obviously have the new cod2_lnxded bin, Think ill go make 
>> >>friends
>> >>with them he he
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Lumo" <lumo at gmen-clan.de>
>> >>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> >>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:12 PM
>> >>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>Well, the PB-files are already finished.
>> >>>Server + Client
>> >>>
>> >>>Take a look here:
>> >>>http://www.evenbalance.com/index.php?page=dl-cod2.php
>> >>>
>> >>>So i think we are waiting for the Gamefile cod2_lnxded now ...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>colin at bell-pc.com schrieb:
>> >>>>I would have thought the security of PB anticheat was the makers of 
>> >>>>PB's
>> >>>>problem not Ryan's , Activisions , IW's problem
>> >>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     *From:* Dave Whitney <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>
>> >>>>     *To:* cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>     *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:19 PM
>> >>>>     *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     This is a really good point.  The more I think of this, the more
>> >>>>     it makes sense.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     */Cod Admin <cod at se-easy.net <mailto:cod at se-easy.net>>/* wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>         And for the problem of leaking the beta, we don't have to
>> >>>>         forget punkbuster is part of the code so i think from the 
>> >>>> view
>> >>>>         of security this is the delay. We don't want hackers etc. 
>> >>>> etc.
>> >>>>         break the anticheat, then we have again a game like 
>> >>>> mohaa...No
>> >>>>         anticheat full of cheaters..:-(
>> >>>>
>> >>>>         Cheers
>> >>>>         Quint
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             *From:* LeadBritches
>> >>>> [mailto:leadbritches at austinservers.com]
>> >>>>             *To:* cod at icculus.org
>> >>>>             *Sent:* Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:45:35 +0200
>> >>>>             *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             From my experience here... Ryan has represented
>> >>>>             IW/Activision better than
>> >>>>             they have represented themselves. If they handled their
>> >>>>             business they way
>> >>>>             Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (not 
>> >>>> to
>> >>>>             mention a better
>> >>>>             game) months ago.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             Everything Ryan has done to date has been more than fine
>> >>>>             by me.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             -----Original Message-----
>> >>>>             From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>> >>>>             [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>> >>>>             Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM
>> >>>>             To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>             Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             ah I see ha ha !
>> >>>>             Well they need to give him some overtime and a 
>> >>>> completion
>> >>>>             bonus incentive me
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             thinks :p
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>>             From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net 
>> >>>> <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>> >>>>             To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>>             Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:20 PM
>> >>>>             Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>             > Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a
>> >>>>             damn LOL
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work for
>> >>>>             them, he is a paid
>> >>>>             > sub
>> >>>>             > contractor, thus their approval.
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > -Jim
>> >>>>             > Rudedog
>> >>>>             > FPSadmin.com
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > -----Original Message-----
>> >>>>             > From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>> >>>>             [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>> >>>>             > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:01 AM
>> >>>>             > To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>             > Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt 
>> >>>> support
>> >>>>             the Linux server
>> >>>>             > version and then delay the release untill Activision
>> >>>>             approve it???? . May
>> >>>>             > aswell just release it, if thats the case
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it 
>> >>>> or
>> >>>>             not??
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>>             > From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>> >>>>             <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>>
>> >>>>             > To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>>             > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:50 PM
>> >>>>             > Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any day now...they're
>> >>>>             done, we're just
>> >>>>             >>waiting for Activision to approve them'
>> >>>>             >> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...or am 
>> >>>> i
>> >>>>             missing
>> >>>>             >> somethiing?
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >>>From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net
>> >>>> <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>> >>>>             >>>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>             >>>To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>>             >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>             >>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do much until 
>> >>>> he
>> >>>>             has the final
>> >>>>             >>>code,
>> >>>>             >>>Then that's when all his fun starts ;)
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>-Jim
>> >>>>             >>>Rudedog
>> >>>>             >>>FPSadmin.com
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>-----Original Message-----
>> >>>>             >>>From: Michelle E [mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>> >>>>             <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>]
>> >>>>             >>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM
>> >>>>             >>>To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>             >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release?
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>> >From: Dave Whitney <whitney321 at yahoo.com
>> >>>>             <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>>
>> >>>>             >>> >Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>             >>> >To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>>             >>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>             >>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> >Last fall, I think is was almost 2 weeks before the
>> >>>>             beta got leaked,
>> >>>>             >>> >and
>> >>>>             >>> >then a month for the final release.
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> >Frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz
>> >>>>             <mailto:frenton at orcon.net.nz>> wrote: Not so sure about
>> >>>>             that, but it
>> >>>>             >>> >took
>> >>>>             >>> >several weeks that time -
>> >>>>             >>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...
>> >>>>             >>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> > > Ola all,
>> >>>>             >>> > >
>> >>>>             >>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took during 
>> >>>> vcod
>> >>>>             and uo or even
>> >>>>             >>> > > with the
>> >>>>             >>> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries
>> >>>> approved?
>> >>>>             >>> > >
>> >>>>             >>> > > That might give a good indication for how long 
>> >>>> we
>> >>>>             all will have to
>> >>>>             >>> > > wait.
>> >>>>             >>> > >
>> >>>>             >>> > > And looking at the IWN forums, they all are
>> >>>>             getting crazy now
>> >>>>             >>> > > waiting again
>> >>>>             >>> > > for ACTV to approve for the last part of the 
>> >>>> patch
>> >>>>             to get all their
>> >>>>             >>> > > servers
>> >>>>             >>> > > running;-)
>> >>>>             >>> > > It is almost hilarious on that forum and every
>> >>>>             body flaming
>> >>>>             >>> > > constantly to
>> >>>>             >>> > > IW/AV.
>> >>>>             >>> > >
>> >>>>             >>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod gamers 
>> >>>> are
>> >>>>             happy that at
>> >>>>             >>> > > least you
>> >>>>             >>> > > give us the support which we should actually get
>> >>>>             from IW/AV for al
>> >>>>             >>> > > those
>> >>>>             >>> > > linux boxes that run cod2.
>> >>>>             >>> > >
>> >>>>             >>> > > MacBooom
>> >>>>             >>> > >
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> >
>> >>>>             >>> >---------------------------------
>> >>>>             >>> >Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make
>> >>>>             PC-to-Phone calls. Great
>> >>>>             >>>rates
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>> >starting at 1&cent;/min.
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>  >>>_________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>             >>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop 
>> >>>> search!
>> >>>>             >>>http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>>
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>_________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>             >> Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger?
>> >>>>             Download MSN Messenger
>> >>>>             >> 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >> --
>> >>>>             >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>>             >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>>             >> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
>> >>>>             Release Date: 12/04/2006
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >>
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             > --
>> >>>>             > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>>             > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>>             > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - 
>> >>>> Release
>> >>>>             Date: 12/04/2006
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>             >
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Blab-away for as little as 1�/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
>> >>>>
>> >>>><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
>> >>>>     using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>>     Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>>     Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>> >>>>     12/04/2006
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>--
>> >>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 
>> >>>12/04/2006
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free 
>> > newsletters!
>> > http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 
>> > 12/04/2006
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2006




More information about the Cod mailing list