[cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
colin at bell-pc.com
colin at bell-pc.com
Thu Apr 13 10:55:36 EDT 2006
Ah so PB obviously have the new cod2_lnxded bin, Think ill go make friends
with them he he
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lumo" <lumo at gmen-clan.de>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> Well, the PB-files are already finished.
> Server + Client
>
> Take a look here:
> http://www.evenbalance.com/index.php?page=dl-cod2.php
>
> So i think we are waiting for the Gamefile cod2_lnxded now ...
>
>
> colin at bell-pc.com schrieb:
>> I would have thought the security of PB anticheat was the makers of PB's
>> problem not Ryan's , Activisions , IW's problem
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> *From:* Dave Whitney <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>
>> *To:* cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:19 PM
>> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>
>> This is a really good point. The more I think of this, the more
>> it makes sense.
>>
>> */Cod Admin <cod at se-easy.net <mailto:cod at se-easy.net>>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>> And for the problem of leaking the beta, we don't have to
>> forget punkbuster is part of the code so i think from the view
>> of security this is the delay. We don't want hackers etc. etc.
>> break the anticheat, then we have again a game like mohaa...No
>> anticheat full of cheaters..:-(
>>
>> Cheers
>> Quint
>>
>> *From:* LeadBritches [mailto:leadbritches at austinservers.com]
>> *To:* cod at icculus.org
>> *Sent:* Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:45:35 +0200
>> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>
>> From my experience here... Ryan has represented
>> IW/Activision better than
>> they have represented themselves. If they handled their
>> business they way
>> Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (not to
>> mention a better
>> game) months ago.
>>
>> Everything Ryan has done to date has been more than fine
>> by me.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM
>> To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>
>> ah I see ha ha !
>> Well they need to give him some overtime and a completion
>> bonus incentive me
>>
>> thinks :p
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>> To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:20 PM
>> Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>
>>
>> > Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a
>> damn LOL
>> >
>> > Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work for
>> them, he is a paid
>> > sub
>> > contractor, thus their approval.
>> >
>> > -Jim
>> > Rudedog
>> > FPSadmin.com
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:01 AM
>> > To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >
>> > So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt support
>> the Linux server
>> > version and then delay the release untill Activision
>> approve it???? . May
>> > aswell just release it, if thats the case
>> >
>> > Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it or
>> not??
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>>
>> > To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:50 PM
>> > Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >
>> >
>> >>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any day now...they're
>> done, we're just
>> >>waiting for Activision to approve them'
>> >> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...or am i
>> missing
>> >> somethiing?
>> >>
>> >>>From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>> >>>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400
>> >>>
>> >>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do much until he
>> has the final
>> >>>code,
>> >>>Then that's when all his fun starts ;)
>> >>>
>> >>>-Jim
>> >>>Rudedog
>> >>>FPSadmin.com
>> >>>
>> >>>-----Original Message-----
>> >>>From: Michelle E [mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>]
>> >>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM
>> >>>To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>
>> >>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> >From: Dave Whitney <whitney321 at yahoo.com
>> <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>>
>> >>> >Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>> >To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Last fall, I think is was almost 2 weeks before the
>> beta got leaked,
>> >>> >and
>> >>> >then a month for the final release.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz
>> <mailto:frenton at orcon.net.nz>> wrote: Not so sure about
>> that, but it
>> >>> >took
>> >>> >several weeks that time -
>> >>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...
>> >>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > Ola all,
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took during vcod
>> and uo or even
>> >>> > > with the
>> >>> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries
>> approved?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > That might give a good indication for how long we
>> all will have to
>> >>> > > wait.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > And looking at the IWN forums, they all are
>> getting crazy now
>> >>> > > waiting again
>> >>> > > for ACTV to approve for the last part of the patch
>> to get all their
>> >>> > > servers
>> >>> > > running;-)
>> >>> > > It is almost hilarious on that forum and every
>> body flaming
>> >>> > > constantly to
>> >>> > > IW/AV.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod gamers are
>> happy that at
>> >>> > > least you
>> >>> > > give us the support which we should actually get
>> from IW/AV for al
>> >>> > > those
>> >>> > > linux boxes that run cod2.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > MacBooom
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >---------------------------------
>> >>> >Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make
>> PC-to-Phone calls. Great
>> >>>rates
>> >>>
>> >>> >starting at 1¢/min.
>> >>>
>>
>> >>>_________________________________________________________________
>> >>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search!
>> >>>http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> >> Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger?
>> Download MSN Messenger
>> >> 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
>> Release Date: 12/04/2006
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release
>> Date: 12/04/2006
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
>>
>> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
>> using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>> 12/04/2006
>>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2006
>
>
More information about the Cod
mailing list