[cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
Lumo
lumo at gmen-clan.de
Thu Apr 13 10:12:02 EDT 2006
Well, the PB-files are already finished.
Server + Client
Take a look here:
http://www.evenbalance.com/index.php?page=dl-cod2.php
So i think we are waiting for the Gamefile cod2_lnxded now ...
colin at bell-pc.com schrieb:
> I would have thought the security of PB anticheat was the makers of
> PB's problem not Ryan's , Activisions , IW's problem
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Dave Whitney <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>
> *To:* cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:19 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
> This is a really good point. The more I think of this, the more
> it makes sense.
>
> */Cod Admin <cod at se-easy.net <mailto:cod at se-easy.net>>/* wrote:
>
>
> And for the problem of leaking the beta, we don't have to
> forget punkbuster is part of the code so i think from the view
> of security this is the delay. We don't want hackers etc. etc.
> break the anticheat, then we have again a game like mohaa...No
> anticheat full of cheaters..:-(
>
> Cheers
> Quint
>
> *From:* LeadBritches [mailto:leadbritches at austinservers.com]
> *To:* cod at icculus.org
> *Sent:* Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:45:35 +0200
> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
> From my experience here... Ryan has represented
> IW/Activision better than
> they have represented themselves. If they handled their
> business they way
> Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (not to
> mention a better
> game) months ago.
>
> Everything Ryan has done to date has been more than fine
> by me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM
> To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
> ah I see ha ha !
> Well they need to give him some overtime and a completion
> bonus incentive me
>
> thinks :p
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
> To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>
>
> > Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a
> damn LOL
> >
> > Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work for
> them, he is a paid
> > sub
> > contractor, thus their approval.
> >
> > -Jim
> > Rudedog
> > FPSadmin.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:01 AM
> > To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> > Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> >
> > So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt support
> the Linux server
> > version and then delay the release untill Activision
> approve it???? . May
> > aswell just release it, if thats the case
> >
> > Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it or
> not??
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>>
> > To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> >
> >
> >>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any day now...they're
> done, we're just
> >>waiting for Activision to approve them'
> >> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...or am i
> missing
> >> somethiing?
> >>
> >>>From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
> >>>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> >>>To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> >>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400
> >>>
> >>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do much until he
> has the final
> >>>code,
> >>>Then that's when all his fun starts ;)
> >>>
> >>>-Jim
> >>>Rudedog
> >>>FPSadmin.com
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Michelle E [mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>]
> >>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM
> >>>To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> >>>
> >>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >From: Dave Whitney <whitney321 at yahoo.com
> <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>>
> >>> >Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> >>> >To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
> >>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> >>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
> >>> >
> >>> >Last fall, I think is was almost 2 weeks before the
> beta got leaked,
> >>> >and
> >>> >then a month for the final release.
> >>> >
> >>> >Frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz
> <mailto:frenton at orcon.net.nz>> wrote: Not so sure about
> that, but it
> >>> >took
> >>> >several weeks that time -
> >>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...
> >>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Ola all,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took during vcod
> and uo or even
> >>> > > with the
> >>> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries approved?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > That might give a good indication for how long we
> all will have to
> >>> > > wait.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > And looking at the IWN forums, they all are
> getting crazy now
> >>> > > waiting again
> >>> > > for ACTV to approve for the last part of the patch
> to get all their
> >>> > > servers
> >>> > > running;-)
> >>> > > It is almost hilarious on that forum and every
> body flaming
> >>> > > constantly to
> >>> > > IW/AV.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod gamers are
> happy that at
> >>> > > least you
> >>> > > give us the support which we should actually get
> from IW/AV for al
> >>> > > those
> >>> > > linux boxes that run cod2.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > MacBooom
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >---------------------------------
> >>> >Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make
> PC-to-Phone calls. Great
> >>>rates
> >>>
> >>> >starting at 1¢/min.
> >>>
> >>>_________________________________________________________________
> >>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search!
> >>>http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger?
> Download MSN Messenger
> >> 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
> Release Date: 12/04/2006
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release
> Date: 12/04/2006
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
> using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
> 12/04/2006
>
More information about the Cod
mailing list