[cod]Disappointing...

[luke at techfreak.org]

I agreee 100% on the PB issue! We will not adopt the game without it.
Somebody needs to fire the fool who said we dont need it.

>
>
> Yes, I agree. Indeed all along it has been clear the direction ACTV
> was taking with COD2.  After playing COD for a few years, indeed
> players skills have increased.  Let there be a UO2, but leave the
> more infantry based COD2 alone.  It Just needs PB.
>
> There is nothing like being a good skilled rifleman, and getting wiped by
> a
> n00b on a T-34.  Or worse, the ole' jeep crush against the wall! ;-))
>
> There is history in the battles here, and ACTV took WWII to the next step
> and did a great job.
>
> Mark
>
> PS.  Did I mention that it needs an Anti-Cheat System?  Indeed,
> Yes, we will all be having a good old noyade  directly after we
> have completed the task of defenestrating this game if no PB!!!
> I can not be more plain that this ACTV!  Are you Listening?
> Please inform the morologist that decided against PB to
> reconsider.
>
>
>
>
> At 05:51 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
>
>>I was hoping it would NOT be like UO as I much preferred vanilla COD and
>> tbh
>>I am not disappointed, runs great on a Linux box btw ;)
>>
>>Colin
>
> S1,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE          defilm at acm.org
>                                        defilm at ieee.org
>
>
>