[cod]Disappointing...

[Mark J. DeFilippis]

Yes, I agree. Indeed all along it has been clear the direction ACTV
was taking with COD2.  After playing COD for a few years, indeed
players skills have increased.  Let there be a UO2, but leave the
more infantry based COD2 alone.  It Just needs PB.

There is nothing like being a good skilled rifleman, and getting wiped by a
n00b on a T-34.  Or worse, the ole' jeep crush against the wall! ;-))

There is history in the battles here, and ACTV took WWII to the next step
and did a great job.

Mark

PS.  Did I mention that it needs an Anti-Cheat System?  Indeed,
Yes, we will all be having a good old noyade  directly after we
have completed the task of defenestrating this game if no PB!!!
I can not be more plain that this ACTV!  Are you Listening?
Please inform the morologist that decided against PB to
reconsider.




At 05:51 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:

>I was hoping it would NOT be like UO as I much preferred vanilla COD and tbh
>I am not disappointed, runs great on a Linux box btw ;)
>
>Colin

S1,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE          defilm at acm.org
                                       defilm at ieee.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20051028/10f06a46/attachment.htm>