[cod] monitoring script

Ian mu mu.llamas at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 12:07:45 EDT 2005


Well so far no one else has actually offered an alternative that will work
"properly", yet I've offered to rewrite one for nothing that would be
available in the public domain, think if thats the attitude naturally why
would anyone bother, and not surprising not many scripts are out there if as
soon as someone offers they get slagged off.
 Any yes, this reply is just as bad as the previous 2. Just curious way to
slag people off who offer to help. (and people who know me know I will spend
ages coding for others for no gain, thats pretty much all I do)
 Why not a simple "thanks for the offer, but would prefer a solution already
done"? Why does everyone have to get bitchy when people offer help?
 Christ on a bike, is this what you all do when people offer help?
 /me shrugs

 On 10/18/05, Jay Vasallo <jayco1 at charter.net> wrote:
>
> Please....
>  This answer is just as bad as your first answer.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Ian mu <mu.llamas at gmail.com>
> *To:* cod at icculus.org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:51 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [cod] monitoring script
>
>  Gawd, I said the essence of the how it works and said what he needed as
> one avenue, is that better or worse than no reply? I've even offered to help
> (in other words will redo code myself, just I can't release proprietory code
> is the simple fact many will understand apart from yourself obviously, and
> why there isn't a flood of scripts that everyone has). Is it that much of a
> problem for me to post, to explain how to do it (in other words to make it
> managable steps), and if no better options I'll help code it?
>  OMG you told him to google! Couldn't you provide a link, don't you want
> to help (and more importantly does it catch hung processes)?
>  Just get of your high horse you ffs, but thanks for giving him another
> alternative.
>
>  On 10/18/05, frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz> wrote:
> >
> > Dr. D., You're absolutely right. With these answers before yours I've
> > made some experiences in the Everyone-helps-each-other-in-the-linux
> > world: "Oh yes, it's so easy, but unfortunateley we can't help you
> > directly now! Try to google it!" If he had found some script at google,
> > do u think he would post his question about such script on this HELPING
> > list? Crap...
> > C'mon guys, it's not the Pentagon (oops, now using this word this list
> > could be automatically scanned by authorities, lol) script of the
> > scripts.
> >
> > PS: NOT ALL of linux guys are so useless to other people i know that
> > (vice versa: most of them are very patient ( ::--O) and helpful...)
> > and now:flame me...
> >
> > PS2: Dr. D:Is it possible that you email me your script called dtools,
> > because i can't find at Google (and other searchengines)... Thanks alot!
> >
> > F.
> >
> > Mark J. DeFilippis schrieb:
> > >
> > > Oh for Christ Sakes. Like this is top secret NORAD code!
> > > This is a worthless post. If you can't help the guy, but Ohhhh he has
> > > scripts...
> > > Is everyone impressed?
> > >
> > > Sorry for all that know me, but this type of response is pathetic
> > > for a list that is all about help.
> > >
> > > Google "dtools.tar". If you can't find it, send me an email
> > > and I will send you a copy. (Under 3KB). It runs multiple
> > > supervisors (One for each server you want to run). If the
> > > server crashes, or they power your machine, it restarts
> > > them all. It allows easy manual downing and bringing up your servers.
> > >
> > > Simple as that.
> > >
> > > Easy to configure. Includes C source code. Please just don't create
> > > viruses
> > > with it, or break in to NORAD and start up Global Thermodynamic
> > Nuclear
> > > War, or shutdown California's telephone system. :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Dr. D
> > >
> > >
> > > At 06:40 AM 10/18/2005, you wrote:
> > >
> > >> I just have a simple perl script that uses qstat, polls to check
> > >> servers up (in case process is up but its "hung"), and restarts if
> > its
> > >> down. Can't really give it out unfortunately (not my choice), but
> > >> certainly don't mind helping anyone create their own so to speak.
> > >>
> > >> On 10/18/05, Xealot <<mailto: xealot at gmail.com>xealot at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> You dont need any particular knowledge to do this,
> > >> i would imagine to do it very simple you can google up the basics
> > about
> > >> bash scripting (found out IFs and such), also google about cronjobs
> > >>
> > >> simply set a cronjob to execute a script that will look at running
> > apps
> > >> if the cod server is amongst them nothing happens, if not.. it
> > >> executed the cod
> > >> binary again
> > >>
> > >> - Xealot
> > >>
> > >> On 10/18/05, Geoff Goas <<mailto:gitman at gmail.com> gitman at gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > i know this has been mailed before, but does anyone have a nice
> > shell
> > >> > script that will monitor my cod/uo server to see if it has crashed
> > and
> > >> > will restart it if it has?
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Geoff Goas, Administrator
> > >> > |ax|anarchic - <http://www.anarchic-x.com >
> > http://www.anarchic-x.com
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE defilm at acm.org
> > > defilm at ieee.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20051018/5b086f52/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cod mailing list