[cod] HI

Mark J. DeFilippis defilm at acm.org
Sat Jun 4 17:22:03 EDT 2005


OMG!

I have been sorting my 200+ Inbound project messages manually for
years. I estimate I lose about a man hour each day doing this,
but there are so many projects to keep track of...

I can not believe it.  You don't realize how much you have just
increased the quality of life for me... Often I don't get to answer
email as fast as it comes in during the day, or I would not get
any work done.   That 1-2.5 hours is usually after 6pm.  I can now
cut that down by about an hour and go home and see my boys
before they are asleep!

Thank you!

Dr. D

At 05:05 PM 6/4/2005, you wrote:

>I think this is what you mean:
>
>
>    * Right-click the ordering bars at the top of the message list view 
> (From, Subject, etc)
>    * Click Customise Current View
>    * Click Group By
>    * Select Group items by: Conversation
>    * OK, OK
>
>
>
>That should be what youre after :-)
>
>---------------------------------------
>Chris Adams
>GameSwitch Ltd.
><http://www.gameswitch.co.uk>www.gameswitch.co.uk
>
>(0871) 218 GAME
>+44 (0)871 218 4263
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark J. DeFilippis [mailto:defilm at acm.org]
>Sent: 04 June 2005 18:22
>To: cod at icculus.org
>Subject: Re: [cod] HI
>
>
>
>Outlook has threading similar to the threading from Usenet for email????
>
>I use outlook virus magnet at work as well, but managing my email is a PIA.
>If it had threading so it would attach itself to the existing thread
>It would be a HUGE time saver for me.  I have never seen this
>but if someone has a link for info on where this is, I would be soooo
>grateful.
>
>GMail is out for me as well.  Corporate policy. While I like it,
>I wrote the policy book, and it would really look bad if I didn't
>follow my own guidelines.. It is a no-no same as Gotomypc,
>etc...  Just business and new SOX requirements since all the
>corporate scandals...
>
>Link anyone?  MS Support for outlook was not very helpful
>when I searched under "threading, threads". :-(
>
>Tks!
>
>Md
>
>At 04:28 PM 6/1/2005, you wrote:
>
>Everyone has their favorite email client. pine is the best! To each there own.
>
>-Jeremiah
>
>
>
>On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Robert Mount wrote:
>
>
>yes, Gmail will pop to get mail from another account.  You can also
>pop in to pick up mail (but no imap).
>
>Only thing missing is imap and the ability to set your "from" address.
>You can set your "reply to" address though.
>
>--Rob
>
>On 6/1/05, Chris Adams <chris at fragzzhost.com> wrote:
>
>I don't think I could really trust a web-based e-mail service... too
>paranoid. Luckily I have RAM to throw away :-)
>
>"It's nice when you have a year to customize
>it, deal with viruses and exploits, keep up on security patches, etc" -
>I disagree with this though. Viruses and exploits? A year customising
>it?
>
>Just wondering - I assume Gmail does have some kind of POP / IMAP fetch
>facility from other mail servers? Else really the argument is over now
>on my part lol
>
>---------------------------------------
>Chris Adams
>GameSwitch Ltd.
>www.gameswitch.co.uk
>
>(0871) 218 GAME
>+44 (0)871 218 4263
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: BludGeonT[EUG] [mailto:bludgeont at gmail.com]
>Sent: 01 June 2005 19:01
>To: cod at icculus.org
>Subject: Re: [cod] HI
>
>I use outlook for work.  It's nice when you have a year to customize
>it, deal with viruses and exploits, keep up on security patches, etc.
>JUST so you can come close to the coolness of gmail, which it still
>doesn't rival.   Outlook works, but its bloatware, anyway - I only
>chime in because I use Outlook with the oracle connectors or work to
>use and yah its cool, but gmail uses only your browser, and not a 50mb
>memory gulping program like outlook.  If youre going to get and send a
>lot of email and want it to be nice looking and easy to manage, use
>gmail.  If you want to use tasks lists, calendars, notes, etc -
>outlook is for you.
>
>Bludge
>
>On 6/1/05, Chris Adams <chris at fragzzhost.com> wrote:
>
>Microsoft Outlook does exactly the same (i.e that comes with Office,
>
>not
>
>Outlook Express)
>
>---------------------------------------
>Chris Adams
>GameSwitch Ltd.
>www.gameswitch.co.uk
>
>(0871) 218 GAME
>+44 (0)871 218 4263
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: todd at simops.com [mailto:todd at simops.com]
>Sent: 16 May 2005 14:19
>To: cod at icculus.org
>Subject: Re: [cod] HI
>
>Hook a brother up Please.
>TLP
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "BludGeonT[EUG]" <bludgeont at gmail.com>
>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [cod] HI
>
>
>In my opinion, this mailing list receives a LOT of email - BUT - If
>you have a good email client (such as gmail) then threads and email
>mangement is simple, organized, and in no way overwhelming.  I can't
>put words to what Google has done with their gmail, it simply is 2GB
>of pure goodness.  I love receiving tons of email when its as
>organized as it gets without any additional work like gmail.
>
>So for those that want COD information, but cant handle the load or
>the clutter that a normal email client creates with mass email, then
>get a gmail account.
>
>I know they aren't that special anymore to have one, but damn I got 50
>inivitations, probably like the rest of you mofos too, so if you need
>a real emaIl client, let me know and I'll give you some, gmail is
>still in beta and invite only.
>
>My 2 cents,
>
>BludGeonT[EUG]
>
>On 5/15/05, Lestat <lestat at aresgames.com> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Seem BF2 will need lot of CPU power for run server so need to see if
>
>they
>
>will be viable good price server's possibilities...
>
>So wait and see and never say a game will be good before see if they
>
>got a
>
>good dedicated server...
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Paul Warren" <paulwarren at blueyonder.co.uk>
>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 2:55 AM
>Subject: Re: [cod] HI
>
>
>tbh
>
>{off topic}
>
>BF2 will rule. ITs out end of this month and should rock till cod
>
>2
>
>>>comes out and then cod2 will own.
>>>
>>>oh and CS:source will be there for ever
>>>Luke Antins (Firestorm Games) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>I agree, this (and other icculus lists) have been a excellent
>
>source
>
>>>of information when any issues arise. It may get quiet from time
>
>to
>
>>>time, but that's better then having it filled with useless off
>
>topic
>
>>>talk :¬)
>>>
>>>As for COD2, it will be interesting to see what happens!
>>>
>>>Kind Regards
>>>Luke Antins
>>>--
>>>[Firestorm Games]
>>>http://www.firestorm-games.net/
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>Jeremiah Gilbert aka |VTN|[Jagged]
>VTNetworks Server Admin
>support at vtnetworks.net
>http://www.vtnetworks.net
>
>S4-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mark J. DeFilippis                    defilm at acm.org
>                                       defilm at ieee.org
S1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE          defilm at acm.org
                                       defilm at ieee.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20050604/9c46d1bf/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cod mailing list