[cod] Any info on a new patch?

[crash]

 POSSIBLY THOSE THAT DO NOT UPDATE ORIGINAL C.O.D. TO 1.5 BEFORE PATCHING C.O.D.U.O  TO 1.51...

i was guilty of this and experienced lag issues and several random freezes _ as well as unable to download from servers on a random basis -- depending on where the .pks originated from --ie: main or uo --

  ok ill go back under my desk now....crash(mtl) out !! 


Psalms 118:8 
"It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man."

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Geoff Goas 
  To: cod at icculus.org 
  Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:36 PM
  Subject: Re: [cod] Any info on a new patch?


  i get random crashes but not very often... i suspect its just people
  exploiting the exploit.


  On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:24:22 -0800, Siq <siq at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
  > 
  > 
  > I keep hearing of people complaining about random crashes but I have yet to
  > have either of our two servers crash since 1.51 came out.  We run a BAS/DOM
  > server and a DM/TDM/HQ server and they both are rock solid.  Lag is another
  > issue altogether.  We even run AWE mod on the DM/TDM/HQ server and still no
  > crashes.  There either has to be a config file problem or you have a bad pk3
  > somewhere.
  > 
  >  
  > 
  > Siq
  > 
  >  
  > ________________________________
  > 
  > 
  > From: Mark J. DeFilippis [mailto:defilm at acm.org] 
  > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:33 AM
  > To: cod at icculus.org
  > Subject: Re: [cod] Any info on a new patch?
  > 
  > 
  >  
  > 
  > 
  > Was Steve's thread just "Hijacked"? or am I missing part of the list?
  > 
  > Was there ever a simple confirmation?  Even with the latest PB patches,
  > we still see crashes as well.  It always appears to be during a TWl or OGL
  > match!
  > 
  > Murphy's law.  I can run foy 24x7 full all day long on CTF, and have a
  > dedicated server for it.
  > But TDM is "Death", and appears to crash more than any other game type for
  > some reason,
  > and particularly in Arnhem.
  > 
  > I was hoping the latest pb update would do it, but there are clearly more
  > issues here
  > as logs have shown.
  > 
  > I didn't think an "ack" was much to ask for on a patch.  If the "official
  > release" Ryan speaks of is the "current" windows patched 1.51b version, I
  > will be very disappointed. I doubt I will be alone.
  > "Yea! Lets have a party for the official release of the latest broken
  > version".  "Feels like Windows... should be Linux".
  > 
  > D
  > 
  > 
  > At 10:20 AM 1/17/2005, you wrote:
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > I agree, just a simple confirmation as to what is being done, what issue(s)
  > are being address would be nice to see!
  > 
  > Kind Regards
  > Luke Antins
  > --
  > [Firestorm Games]
  > http://www.firestorm-games.net/
  > 
  > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Ian mu wrote:
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > Yup still seeing crashes even since the latest pb release as well
  > which we thought were responsible for some.
  > 
  > Just a confirmation its being looked at would be a start as haven't
  > heard a lot so far, or if more information or logs need posting etc.
  > or help needed with tracking it down.
  > 
  > S1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  > Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE          defilm at acm.org
  >                                       defilm at ieee.org
  > 
  >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20050120/6db05cf9/attachment.htm>