[cod] What distro of linux ??

Robert Mount rmount at gmail.com
Sat Feb 26 20:15:09 EST 2005


CentOS, which for those who don't know is built from the RedHat
Enterprise source RPMs.

It's very solid, but not bleeding edge so you don't get some of the
latest and greatest features (unless you compile on your own).

http://www.centos.org


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:02:26 +0100, Raphael Teske <teske at free.fr> wrote:
> Debian Woody
> 
> tazman schrieb:
> > We've experimented with Fedora Core 3, Mandrake 10.1 and 10.2 beta3, and
> > SuSE 9.2 on 2 AMD XP 3400+ 64bit servers. Mandrake 10.1 X86_64 is
> > running on one and Mandrake 10.2 beta3 32bit is on the other. We got
> > better performance with the Mandrake distro.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ian mu wrote:
> >
> >> Btw, if looking for a stable setup without having to go the fed core
> >> route, you could take a look at centos, which is based on redhat es,
> >> but don't have to pay anything basically. Can download a single server
> >> cd if you want (save having to download various fed core cd's etc).
> >> Just another option worth considering. (I actually use centos as my
> >> main stable desktop oddly enough as well switching with fed core which
> >> I "mess" more with).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>



More information about the Cod mailing list