[cod] Come on guys release a fix for the CPU usage

[Geoff Goas]

I doubt it has anything to do with vehicles (jeeps OR tanks). Like I
said in a previous message, my 20-man UO TDM server that runs only the
vanilla CoD maps still uses 50-60% cpu, while my 20-man CoD TDM server
never goes above 20%.


On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:59:31 +0100, Chris Adams <chris at fragzzhost.com> wrote:
> "You're kidding right? I don't know what 'state' yours is in, but my
> server
> runs fine, and I'm glad to have it!"
> 
> Judging by the fact that almost all recent mails on this list have been
> about the high CPU usage, I don't think he's kidding. I'm sure your
> 'server' will run fine if it's alone on a reasonably-powered box, but
> for those of us who have to put more than one server on a box, we really
> can't offer the QoS to customers as it stands. I think Steve is probably
> pretty knowledgeable in making servers work looking at his posts on
> practically every game server mailing list there is, and also I think
> that the number of servers on master lists beginning with 'Multiplay'
> points towards this conclusion also :-)
> 
> Anyway I'll still waiting patiently for the good reports to come in
> before we start to offer UO as a game :)
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> Chris Adams
> Fragzzhost
> 
> T (07005) 964 855
> F (07005) 964 857
> www.fragzzhost.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Brown [mailto:volfin1 at earthlink.net]
> Sent: 17 October 2004 15:22
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [cod] Come on guys release a fix for the CPU usage
> 
> You're kidding right? I don't know what 'state' yours is in, but my
> server
> runs fine, and I'm glad to have it!
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Hartland" <killing at multiplay.co.uk>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [cod] Come on guys release a fix for the CPU usage
> 
> > Indeed we are waiting patiently. The main complaint though I suppose
> > boils down to the fact that this was so blatantly obvious for anyone
> > running a server it should not have been released in this state.
> >
> 
>