<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>RE: [bf1942] Official WW2 mod for BFV, server files?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Just to clear up any confusion:<BR>
<BR>
The Canada office made some of the free content maps for BF1942, but all the patch code (versions 1.31-1.6) was written by my patch team in Stockholm.<BR>
<BR>
Vietnam was written entirely in Canada with some last-minute crunch help from my team.<BR>
<BR>
// Andreas<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Hammer 2.0 [<A HREF="mailto:tpshammer@hotmail.com">mailto:tpshammer@hotmail.com</A>]<BR>
Sent: Sat 8/21/2004 11:08 PM<BR>
To: bf1942@icculus.org<BR>
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Official WW2 mod for BFV, server files?<BR>
<BR>
Excuse me for having to correct you here, but it's DICE Canada who is making<BR>
the BF1942 patches, so I'd say stx has a valid argument.<BR>
I will not comment any further on the matter, as it just makes me sad which<BR>
will make me start drinking, driving, getting busted for DUI, thrown in<BR>
jail, losing my job and finally dieing, homeless, in the gutter.<BR>
<BR>
/H<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
>From: Scott DeLeury <Sjdel@nycap.rr.com><BR>
>Reply-To: bf1942@icculus.org<BR>
>To: <bf1942@icculus.org><BR>
>Subject: Re: [bf1942] Official WW2 mod for BFV, server files?<BR>
>Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:32:14 -0400<BR>
><BR>
>Yes, BF1942 could stand another patch. I agree with that. The thing<BR>
>you're<BR>
>not taking into account is that a whole different segment of DICE created<BR>
>BF:Vietnam. So the time they put into creating the WWII mod wasn't time<BR>
>away from patching 1.6. DICE Canada had nothing (or very little) to do<BR>
>with<BR>
>BF1942, so you're barking up the wrong tree there.<BR>
><BR>
>I also don't think that everyone that purchased BFV has BF1942. While it<BR>
>would have been nice to get a larger set of maps with the new mod, since<BR>
>there is no map download facility built in to either engine, it gives those<BR>
>who haven't had a chance to play BF1942 just a little more opportunity to<BR>
>have some fun.<BR>
><BR>
>Sure, as I said, I'd love to see a BF1942 patch, as the client JUST came<BR>
>out<BR>
>for my Platform of choice, the Mac. I love both games, and will still buy<BR>
>BF2 when it comes out, Hopefully for both Platforms (Which means I'll end<BR>
>up<BR>
>buying 2 copies, just as I did with BF1942...), but as Andreas said a bit<BR>
>ago, time on a BF1942 server patch or something is time away from BF2.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> > From: Stefan Engbersen <stonex@freebsd.nl><BR>
> > Reply-To: bf1942@icculus.org<BR>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 21:16:19 +0200<BR>
> > To: bf1942@icculus.org<BR>
> > Subject: Re: [bf1942] Official WW2 mod for BFV, server files?<BR>
> ><BR>
> > May I ask why this mod is released ?<BR>
> > Does Dice think all BF1942 will move over?<BR>
> > To continue on the BF1942 Petition topic, this is another waste of time,<BR>
> > nothing the community has asked for.<BR>
> > Only BF:V people will start playing this mod, BF1942 people are<BR>
> > forgotten again, but still the more played game<BR>
> > throughout Europe.<BR>
> > This time could have been better invested in a new BF1942 1.7 patch with<BR>
> > a load of bugfixes, which the petition people<BR>
> > (<A HREF="http://www.so-fragged.com/bftv/">http://www.so-fragged.com/bftv/</A>)<BR>
> > have signed for and never had any reply from Dice, a freaking petition<BR>
> > with 8500 unique votes has never been shown for any game on the internet<BR>
> > !!!!!!<BR>
> > Good job DICE, really!<BR>
> > Anyway I am glad to report the amount of BF:V has DECREASED since the<BR>
> > v1.1 patch and the amount of BF1942 has INCREASED a little again and I<BR>
>hope<BR>
> > Dice ever sees the light (again).<BR>
> > And please flame me, because i'm a real dedicated community person.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Regards,<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Stefan aka stx<BR>
> > Clanbase.com<BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> > Steven Hartland wrote:<BR>
> ><BR>
> >> We are already been asked about this so any chance we can get the<BR>
> >> server release early so we can be prepared? Pleaseeeee.<BR>
> >><BR>
><A HREF="http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/vietnam/us/editorial.jsp?src=ww2m">http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/vietnam/us/editorial.jsp?src=ww2m</A><BR>
> >> od<BR>
> >><BR>
> >><BR>
> >> Steve / K<BR>
> >><BR>
> >><BR>
> >> ================================================<BR>
> >> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd.<BR>
> >> and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of<BR>
> >> misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying,<BR>
> >> printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in<BR>
> >> it.<BR>
> >> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission<BR>
> >> please telephone (023) 8024 3137<BR>
> >> or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.<BR>
> >><BR>
> >><BR>
> >><BR>
> ><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
_________________________________________________________________<BR>
Chat: Ha en fest på Habbo Hotel<BR>
<A HREF="http://habbohotel.msn.se/habbo/sv/channelizer">http://habbohotel.msn.se/habbo/sv/channelizer</A> Checka in här!<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>