<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [bf1942] bfv server le duexieme essai</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana">It’s not <B>THAT</B> big of a deal, as we’re used to upgrading kernels and whatnot for andreas :)<BR>
However, it would be nice to see v1.0 run on the same platforms bf1942 1.6 runs on, (ie. I don’t want to have to upgrade 60 game servers come Monday morning ;)<BR>
So if making a set of binaries not using a later glibc is doable, that might be preferred. A LOT of people will have trouble with this, im sure.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 3/10/04 1:53 PM, "Peter Chang" <peter.chang@dicecanada.com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Tahoma"><B>From:</B> David Snodgrass [mailto:dave@pmmci.com]<BR>
<B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 10, 2004 1:45 PM<BR>
<B>To:</B> bf1942@icculus.org<BR>
<B>Subject:</B> Re: [bf1942] bfv server le duexieme essai<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana">Wow, this needs Glibc 2.3? Anyone running debian, I believe you will need to go to unstable for this.</FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial"> <BR>
</FONT></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana">hmmm... i don't think it *needs* 2.3. its just what i happen to have on the machine i'm building on (which was debian stable before i apt-got a new compiler).<BR>
<BR>
if this is a problem i can try to weed out the dynamic dependency and make static more static<BR>
<BR>
\p<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana"><BR>
</FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>