<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [bf1942] BFV Server and XML Logs</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> From: Brigham Stevens [<A HREF="mailto:brs@vikingmind.com">mailto:brs@vikingmind.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Subject: Re: [bf1942] BFV Server and XML Logs</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> We make heavy usage of the remote console protocol to manage </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> my servers... We </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> have a web based, database driven admin system, and I'm </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> really hoping that BFV </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> will support this out of the box so we can have well managed </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> servers from the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> start.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>hmm.... did you see my message before where we didn't even notice that there was extra remote console functionality in 1.6? (it sort of got lost in the enormous amount of fixes they've done since the bfv branch and the fact that i'm a moron). we discovered that there was more functionality yesterday (no one here had even heard of the mode where it grouped writes to the server) and that was a bit too late for making the ea deadline.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> So I don't know if the above comments qualify as the answer </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> to your question </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> about forgetting something... but I'm hoping you all didn't </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> just give up on </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> CTF... It is way more exciting gameplay than CQ mode if ya ask me.:)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>i don't know about more exciting. i suck so much that i have a hard time against the bots :-)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>\p</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>