<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
I'll put in my two cents here.<br>
<br>
I, and most of my mates, hardly play much these days because of all the freaking
cheaters. I could give a flying f... if private mods are available as long
as the cheating is stopped. It would be so nice if I was driving a brand
new Tiger and some little cheating loser in a Sherman would no longer be
able to vape me with a near miss.<br>
Just my opinion...<br>
Arne Kühl wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid000401c30a52$59b3fdb0$877ba8c0@mainframe">
<pre wrap="">there should be a serverside setting if client-mods should be activated or
disabled...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maarten De Meyer" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:keats@prophecy.be"><keats@prophecy.be></a>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bf1942@icculus.org"><bf1942@icculus.org></a>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: [bf1942] Patch petition
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This may not be linux related; but it sure is serveradmin and patch 1.4
thus linux-server related, but forgive me if you consider this to be in
the wrong place.
I just wanted to ask dice not to take the anti-anti-cheat petition too
seriously. It is a petition started by a disgruntled modmaker refusing
to make his mod client-side, it was started without the knowledge that
the client-side-mod blocking would be a serverside option, and if you
read the comments you will see that it is mostly signed by ignorant kids
that are afraid they wont be able to play Desert Combat anymore.
So please, make the 1.4 as it was announced (that is, excellent), and
let the storm in a glass of water blow over :)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>