VS: [bf1942] Hardware.

[Jani Partanen]

XP Home support 1/2 CPU
XP Pro support 2/4
2k3 stantard (.net) support 4/8
2k3 star trek enteprise support 8/16
2k3 media center edition support 16/32

x/y = physical cpu/logical cpu
Most of the linux distros support 32 physical cpu.
 
I think dual core cpu's are threaded as 1/2


-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: kama [mailto:kama at pvp.se] 
Lähetetty: 8. toukokuuta 2006 16:29
Vastaanottaja: bf1942 at icculus.org
Aihe: Re: [bf1942] Hardware.


Ok, back to this subject again.

how much difference does 200MHz do if I go from 275 to 280?

And how much memory does each server consume? Is 3 GB enough to handle 4
servers?

If so, I can remove some memory and go for a better CPU. I dont want to
put myself in a possition where the server cant host the games.

Also, I am thinking of running Windows 2003 Server. Are there any special
version I need while I am going with Dual DualCore Opterons or can the
stock win2003server handle all "4" CPUs?

/Bjorn

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, kama wrote:

>
> The cost differences between 280's anf 285's is not that great, but there
> is quite a leap down to the 275's.
>
> I will probably go with 275's. Hopefully I can get new funds later to add
> other servers and if we dont, I might just drop the max players to make
> sure the server are capable to run 2142. Or maybe just buy a couple of
> 285's or if something like 295 have been released.
>
> /Bjorn
>
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, "Einar S. Idsø" wrote:
>
> > Hi Bjørn,
> >
> > You may want to consider the 280. BF2 has had its peak already, and new
> > games are on the horizon. No server specs have yet been published for
> > BF2142, but I would expect that game to impose a heavier load than BF2.
> > Also, if you want to be able to run heavy mods such as FH2, you may want
> > a CPU that's a bit stronger than the 275. I'm not saying that this is
> > definitely the case, I am just saying better safe than sorry :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Einar
> >
> > kama wrote:
> > > I'll check out the costs for 275's instead, I just got how much money
I
> > > can spend and going through with 285's will just go over my budget.
> > >
> > > 4GB and SCSI is the default configuration on all our boxes and I will
> > > preferably not go around that.
> > >
> > > /Bjorn
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>BF2 runs best on AMD hardware in our experience. The 285 are top
> > >>of the range CPU's and you will pay for the nose for them. I'd
> > >>suggested using 275 instead which are much more reasonably priced
> > >>and will run 4 * 64 player servers no problems on a dual 275 machine.
> > >>4Gb of ram is also overkill for BF2 2Gb will do you fine. 15k scsi
> > >>the same, consider raid edition SATA instead.
> > >>
> > >>    Steve
> > >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>From: "kama" <kama at pvp.se>
> > >>
> > >>>I am in the middle of buying new hardware for setting up BF2-servers
and
> > >>>are wondering what path we should go for best performance.
> > >>>
> > >>>The choices are either (all w 4GB RAM, 2*73 15krpm, SA6i, Dual CPU):
> > >>>
> > >>>HP DL380 G4 3.4GHz
> > >>>HP DL385 G4 AMD Opteron 285    (DualCore)
> > >>>HP DL385 G4 AMD Opteron 2.8GHz (SingleCore)
> > >>>
> > >>>I have never worked with Opterons in a gaming environment.
> > >>>
> > >>>I will also run them under win2003, or are there any other windows
version
> > >>>that are preferable over 2003?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>================================================
> > >>This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd.
and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of
misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or
otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
> > >>
> > >>In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission
please telephone (023) 8024 3137
> > >>or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>