[bf1942] Another angle

[Steve Getman]

No.  They have nothing to gain by doing so.  In my opinion the lack of 
EULA was lack of QA (as also evidenced by the Linux server build being 
an old version.)

Steve

PhoeniX wrote:

> That could be planned by EA/DICE...
> There was no EULA with the first Demo-Servers, that everyone looks 
> into the config-files and unlock weapons and remove the time-limit was 
> predictable (at least for me!)
>
> Could be that they had this in mind to show us, what they do if you do 
> something wrong, as a warning!
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anton Jansen" <gradius at fmf.nl>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Another angle
>
>
>> Adam Hobbs wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> <rant>
>>> ........
>>> </rant>
>>> mentasm
>>
>>
>>
>> In my experience, people get pissed off for being punished of 
>> something they didn't know. Especially if they believe there actions 
>> are for the common good.
>>
>> Bottom line: EA should have communicated BEFORE they took action.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Anton Jansen
>>
>>