[bf1942] Issues regarding "ranked servers"

Luke luke at techfreak.org
Sun Jun 5 18:03:50 EDT 2005


One post wasnt civil. No need to focus on that. There are plenty of real
issues being brought up here...... if DICE wants to cut us off for a
'heated' discussion than so be it.

And no, I don't condone flaming.

Luke

Kingsley Foreman said:
> The three in Australia were ISP's with games networks not GSP's,
> and we were approached by EA.
>
> I was more commenting on how things in here weren't being civil.
>
> I've been in here since day one and was quite happy not to
> see the abusive comments like you seen in the HL list, that was offcourse
> up until the last 2-3 days.
>
> I don't want to see this list loose its link to Dice like the HL list have
> lost most
> of its to Valve due to the same bickering.
>
> Kingsley
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Ressen" <netadmin at michiganburbs.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Issues regarding "ranked servers"
>
>
>> Kingsley Foreman wrote:
>>> Wasn't going to get into this, cause im running ranking servers.
>>>
>>> but dudes this is our line to DICE, and I for 1 quite like that line.
>>> do you really think after this bunch of bollocks on a bf server support
>>> list
>>> Andreas is going to want to help any of us.
>>>
>>> Take it somewhere that isn't going to hinder our server support chances
>>> from dice.
>>> It is turning into a HL list over here.
>>>
>>> and no I dont make any money on the servers.
>>>
>>> Kingsley
>>>
>>>
>>> -snip-
>>
>> Kingsley, I think the issue is if it's good enough for some GSP's, it
>> should be good enough for all.
>>
>> I think everyone would be happy if EA would allow anyone to apply to be
>> a
>> ranking server.   As long as there's some controls, there shouldn't be a
>> prob.
>>
>> /BA
>>
>


-- 
Blessed are the geeks: for they shall inherit the earth.



More information about the Bf1942 mailing list