[bf1942] Ranked Server ranking delay?

[Steven Hartland]

This can be the case depending on host. We had a delay initially
but then automated the entire process with the guys at EA UK
and has been very quick ever since.

    Steve / K
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Renegade Tyrant 
  To: bf1942 at icculus.org 
  Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 8:57 PM
  Subject: [bf1942] Ranked Server ranking delay?


    I finally got myself a ranked server 3 days ago, but our server still isn't recording ranks on the EA database. The server shows up as ranked but ranks don't stay recorded (even though when you play in the server you can even get a promotion or receive an unlock, but when you login next time all that is gone). Needless to say this inst making members too happy right now. 

     

    My host claims that they gave EA the IPs off all the ranked servers they created and that it is 'in EA's hands'. Whats even more annoying is they say that until EA manually adds our IP, all scores are essentially going into oblivion!!!, so its not a delay on the scores showing up, but a delay on when they even bother to start adding the scores at all. 

     

    Question: Is this normal? (and what is a normal delay time.right now I and others are at 3 days)

     

     

     

    And if this is standard procedure.then how extremely lame of EA to have this kind of process where ranked servers aren't really ranked for a week!!!


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20050723/5bfe5271/attachment.htm>