[bf1942] VOIP and sv.interfaceIP/sv.serverIP
dave at netdefense.ca
Wed Jul 6 10:28:12 EDT 2005
I believe it has something to do with bandwidth monitoring.. but I am not
From: sjdel at nycap.rr.com [mailto:sjdel at nycap.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 3:11 PM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: Re: RE: [bf1942] VOIP and sv.interfaceIP/sv.serverIP
That would be them :) I've run into a number of situations where that has
been a real pain... why not just use 2
physical interfaces, one theirs, one the clients. Would solve so many
----- Original Message -----
From: David Stevens <dave at netdefense.ca>
Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2005 5:03 pm
Subject: RE: [bf1942] VOIP and sv.interfaceIP/sv.serverIP
> Same situation, no solution as of yet.
> I have asked the ISP if I can use the "not allowed" IP.. they
> still have
> not got back to me..
> Are you using 15minuteservers?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sjdel at nycap.rr.com [mailto:sjdel at nycap.rr.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:15 PM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: [bf1942] VOIP and sv.interfaceIP/sv.serverIP
> Don't know if this has been addressed yet or not, if so, I'll dig
> some more
> through my list emails...
> I have a server whose primary IP on my ethernet interface isn't
> supposed to
> be used for anything. I have 12
> other virtual IPs defined and have our bf2 server on the first virtual
> as we know, in this situation, you need to have both sv.serverIP and
> sv.interfaceIP defined in order for the
> server to bind to a specific port. Problem here is that VOIP will
> still bind
> to 0.0.0.0:55124-55125.
> Anyone in a similar situation find a solution to this?
More information about the Bf1942