[bf1942] 1.01 "some time next week"

Ivo Silva ivo at war-zone.net
Fri Jul 1 00:18:34 EDT 2005


EA can just delist the servers from the master server, and no matter 
what browser u use, when u query the master server, de delisted wont be 
sent.

Best regards,
 
Ivo Silva
Sales/Technical Support Executive
HighTechVision^(TM) / War-Zone.net



[RNGD]Tyrant wrote:

>Is it EA's intention to never allow 3rd party browsers to be able to launch
>bf2?...just so they can keep 'delisting'?  I thought the 1.01 was going to
>close the loophole that even allowed people to unlock the weapons, so
>doesn't that make the delisting moot?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Stevens [mailto:dave at netdefense.ca] 
>Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:42 PM
>To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>Subject: RE: [bf1942] 1.01 "some time next week"
>
>I agree.
>
>However, they can't remove their only method of "delisting" the "Nasty
>hackers" now, can they?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Armstrong [mailto:andrewa at bigpond.net.au] 
>Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:45 PM
>To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>Subject: Re: [bf1942] 1.01 "some time next week"
>
>Dissapointing theres no mention/acknowledgement of not being able to join a 
>server via the command line.
>
>- Plasma
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Ivo Silva" <ivo at war-zone.net>
>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:43 PM
>Subject: [bf1942] 1.01 "some time next week"
>
>
>  
>
>http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/editorial.jsp?sr
>c=communityupdate_063005
>  
>
>>I was hoping for the 1.1, not the 1.01, this 1.01 sounds like client side 
>>only, sort of.
>>
>>-- 
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Ivo Silva
>>Sales/Technical Support Executive
>>HighTechVisionT / War-Zone.net
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20050701/ddafef74/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bf1942 mailing list