[bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

[James Gurney]

Well, we disabled PB on our server, and so far it's been pretty smooth, 
so it seems that one of the 2 PB updates which came out in the last 
month or so has messed something up. Good old PB - it's always been such 
a high quality product, I'm astonished that something could possibly 
have gone wrong.</Blatent sarcasm>

James

On 2/23/2005 10:10 PM, Scummy wrote:
> 3.2 P4, 1gb ram.
> We are also the only server on our box.
> 
> Something has changed and our resources or network is not the issue.
> 
> This lag has just occurred over the last few months.
> 
> Suspects are BBO or PB.
> 
> Used to have no issues before.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe [mailto:sechon at blackmud.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:23 PM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)
> 
> 
> Ok..Dual 2.8 Xeon, 2gb ram. 100mbit link. We were the only process on this
> machine, with and without HT enabled via bios. Win2k3. Open to
> suggestions....
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lance Woollett [mailto:baalzaman at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:18 PM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)
> 
> 
> We are currently running some 22 BF (1942 and vietnam) servers, all
> with the BBO tools, and from what we have seen the BBO overhead is
> negligible. The ease of use the tools gives more than makes up for any
> overhead IMO. Got lag issues? Look at your server specs first.
> 
> 
>