[bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

[Mario Massa]

Well it does a bit more then that , breaks up server configuration files
has its own ban list 

  _____  

From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon at ecgnetwork.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:58 PM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

 

I really dont know why people blame BBO.  All it *REALLY* does to the server
is connect over and over on the remote console port to get status updates.

 

If that causes lag then the server has other issues.


Jon

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Mario Massa <mailto:Admin at weaklinks.net>  

To: bf1942 at icculus.org 

Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:55 PM

Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

 

GOING OFF SUBJECT I TOO HAVE A FEW SERVERS AND EVERY USER HAS COMPLAINED OF
LAG But it might be cause by BBO if installed if a few of you guys can get
in touch with me to get to the bottom line of this lag issues
Weaklinks at msn.com or http://bf1942.lightcubed.com pm me there called
Weaklinks


-----Original Message-----
From: James Gurney [mailto:james at globalmegacorp.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 1:48 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

On 2/22/2005 7:46 PM, Neal Clayton wrote:
> 2) An improved engine that doesn't suffer horribly from lag caused by 
> punkbuster

Speaking of which, has anyone else had reports of really bad server lag 
in the last couple of weeks? I'm not talking network latency.. one of 
our players has a network ping of 9ms, so that's not it.. he (as well as 
many others) have complained about the server apparently running 
sluggishly. Server cpu never goes over 40%.. I watched the console and 
the server FPS was high, and utilitization reasonable.. On a whim, I've 
disabled PB and so far, the reports seem to have indicated that the 
problem is solved, although I'm not willing to take this as 100% proof 
yet.. Mmm, 100% proof.. er, anyway, has anyone else seen similar behaviour?

James

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20050223/9fe4ce7a/attachment.htm>